skilled.org TURN ON YOUR BRAIN
Politicians are destroying the UK and inflict conflict with
mass immigration. All problems are worsened by traitors to British
people - treason.
Authorities lack honesty e.g. climate, Covid, Brexit, wokeness, white privilege, transphobia, Islamaphobia... if you disbelieve then read below.
Recent news: Truth about so-called ‘Windrush Generation’ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ZuAdmlIqUo Simon Webb historian & author - Article link
Inequality: are you being deceived to protect the rich and powerful - by those you expect truth and honesty?
For example, are Professor Thomas PIKETTY, Sir Ian Diamond and Sir David Norgrove men of DISHONOUR?
Read the pdfs if you doubt that those in authority or positions of trust are lying to you, a demonstrable FACT.
Is even one worthy of title 'Professor' - a person who accepts unquestioned doctrine as being absolute fact?
Is PIKETTY really the working class hero many think he is? OR do economists display contempt for workers
when they deceive them, say inequality improved (using statistical cons) while rich increase 10% plus more?
They know the truth so clearly afraid to answer the simplest of question. Sold their soul with no self respect.
First
a story - a village notice from the Sheriff of Nottingham,
collector of taxes and agent for King
John:
I wish to inform owners of cottages and peasants who can read, that
while our great King John has doubled income for himself and his 25
Barons, he halved the incomes of all smaller landowners across
entire of England and thus reduced inequality for all of you.
Henceforth, to improve your health and stop villages getting more
smoke filled, he puts new tax on kindling and wood. Praise be
to King John - the creator of jobs and wealth.
Signed - Sheriff of Nottingham
Are YOU happy that the public are treated the same as this - like stupid peasants - by cowardly liars who cannot tell everyone the truth?
IFS even asks, "Why are top incomes racing away?" - (King John doubled income for self and Barons), virtually admit inequality is worsening.
However, saw they revealled this deception and other lies so deleted ER_JC_2013 evidence. I made a copy as they demonstrate their dishonesty.
They all refuse to see just how dishonest they are after accepting obvious fact; top incomes ARE racing away, prefer to pretend self-retardation.
ALL LIE. I prove the measures are statistical cons to deceive people that inequality goes up & down and returns to a previous low level.
Every government since Margaret Thatcher's Big
Bang have made income inequality much worse - the richest getting
the biggest rises.
Many of our problems are with the help of this so-called 'intelligentsia' e.g. fuel poverty and health inequality, which will claim extra lives this winter.
These are people helping those in power get richer, this is while we have energy rationing based on a families income and ability to pay.
If they're being honest, then even as schoolboy I had the education/ intelligence (link) to beat them in maths. Read how pathetic they are.
The truth inequality worsens is beyond self-evident, it's manifest once seen. Rich incomes diverge at higher percentage, economists lie.
Below are the email PDFs - a few people were actually brave enough to reply. Number 12 below is the latest - I will try to update monthly:
STUDENTS - very easy to learn - how to measure income inequality accurately - draft version. CLICK TO OPEN
Coursework: add column for prior year incomes to show ONS a line on the chart for the percentage increase of income - how the rich exacerbate disparity.
I tried to explain to Ms Humphreys that they aren't simply saying, 'the result of Gini is x' - but holding up a distorted mirror to LIE.
Economists ALL know - unless absolute rubbish at maths - it is a demonstrable FACT that INEQUALITY ALWAYS GETS WORSE.
*As I say about corrupt people who cover up big lies: "every one is a rotten apple when given a chance to prove they are not".
A 'Noble Lie' is knowingly propagated by elite to maintain social harmony or advance agenda. Plato concept coined by Socrates.
It is seen they cannot defend their lies. Historically, all should be remembered for naught but lying to public - for greed of the rich.
The same as UK government who know green tax with tripling energy bills do not hinder the lives of their rich donors - it is for you.
Subjective
Opinion
Context: Unlike the woke - I believe the facts are obviously more important than feelings. My feelings are hurt, so sad. Not a crime - move on.
What you think about people involves things like how much you feel you trust them. Not just simply your opinion on how they have behaved.
I have been asked what I think about those I believe facts prove liars with no honour - e.g. Thomas Piketty, Ian Diamond and David Norgrove.
All those too cowardly to answer simple direct questions or tell dangerous lies to others. Concealing truth to deceive - like direct falsehoods.
I think they are a stain on the underpants of mankind. Their stench will make your stomach retch - they have soiled human existence on earth.
If you think this is hyperbole then look forensically at all the lives they helped destroy. Same goes for those involved in other topics e.g. wokery.
These people are usually motivated good, but are demonstrably self-retarded, closing minds to all facts that do not conform to flawed thinking.
e.g. IFS lie shown below on ratios:
"Again a higher number indicates greater
inequality". Lie as same ratio can have greater or lesser
inequality.
Liars OR pathetic moronic fools at IFS e.g. look at 99/90 ratio, sounds most useful: "Describes the inequality between the very top and the top".
So you would think this shows just how the richest people in our country are pulling away from the rest of the high income sector of UK society.
https://equalitytrust.org.uk/how-economic-inequality-defined
So - did all the economists & managers at Institute for Fiscal Studies honestly not realised 2.4 in 2005 was greater inequality than 2.4 in 1988?
They truly never understood that the range was increasing therefore the inequality was getting worse? I paid attention in maths, did you?
NB saying 99/90 "Describes the inequality
between the very top and the top" - actually hides it as richest at
top of 1% inequality worsens most.
Hardly Opus Magnum of Garry Anderson from Liverpool (born 1954), merely collection of his thoughts. Sorry, not good enough to expose liars.
Obviously, I knew what sort of corrupt people I was dealing with so was expecting that. So this is just for the record, all for you folks in the future.
I ask, "How am I wrong" about all things - not one person has made objective response that proves me wrong - else I would change my position.
Attacking corrupt authorities, the individuals in power who are traitors to British people and our country.
IMPORTANT - all inequality measures that I have looked at are statistical confidence tricks - it includes even the praised new Palma ratio.
It is much praised as it is supposed to show inequality better - being the poorest 40% compared to richest 10% of the population.
Scotland 'improved' since 2011/12 to 2014/15,
falling from 118% to 112% with Palma. Good news for Scottish people
and government - or deception?
To explain: they pretend the 40% and 10% groups are two large families – the simple comparison that the Palma ratio shows.
That is where professors 'go wrong'. They are, of course, millions of separate families on differing divergent incomes, divided into two large groups.
If you can think for a moment about just the richest 10% group - concentrate on that.
In any one year the bottom of that range will
rise relatively little, whilst the richest at the top income can
rise by millions.
Quote:
FTSE
100 directors enjoy 27pc pay rises
[rises continued during recession]
So even in that range alone, inequality has
worsened.
Now think about the poorest 40% range of
population – similar will happen there.
The bottom of 40% range raises little or not at
all (poorest stay in poverty) whilst the top of the 40% range rises
much more e.g. minimum wage rise.
Inequality has
worsened in this range
also.
The outcome being that both ranges may have
increased – but undeniably so has inequality - the
gap between bottom and top of population most.
So at the end of this you could see ‘inequality’ using the Palma has improved, purely because of the bottom range total rising more – a statistical con.
Just because the lower range total (with increased inequality) has risen more than the upper range total (with increased inequality) - they say 'inequality' has improved.
What The Flip - are people really that thick -
don't the self-retards realise they are measuring inequality of
families within our country?
These people are intellectual professors of mathematics and economics - I mean, you understand and you think they do not?
That is how the deception in similar comparison inequality measures work e.g. S80/S20.
These self-retards are comparing two families (average of each group) - whilst completely ignoring the ranges - ignoring millions of people.
It was like saying that inequality in the UK
improved just because the average wage went up - clearly not
true.
Very intelligent people have been been told how to do something simple and have not understood what they are doing – which is unbelievable to me.
The public are all treated as though they would never be able to understand or work this out, like imbeciles.
It is most important to note: we are not taught
to think for ourselves, just taught to think the same way as others
(collectivism) so lies continue.
Collectivism so all singing from same hymn sheet e.g. income inequality goes up and down, man can be woman, global warming caused by man...
"Who controls the past controls the future: who controls the present controls the past", think about that when you hear about climate. UK black history...
Again - try to look at this objectively: we are NOT taught to think for ourselves - merely to get the 'correct' answer.
And back from rant to the topic in hand...
UK ONS and other countries statistics offices measure inequality with Lorenz curve and Gini coefficient - it is a confidence trick
FACT: Gini is not only rubbish measuring
inequality within a country, it's useless for comparing any country
year on year but also one country to
another.
The Gini coefficient is a confidence trick to hide the ever widening gap between each countries powerful rich families and the rest of the population. It also clearly hides millions of poor families, many who are in poverty. Obviously, nobody wants to admit they know this. Using frequency distribution to hide the wealthy, it only compares the poor to average income - not comparing the millions of poorest families on lowest income to the richest.
I use the analogy of measuring inequality with a rubber band in my video - inequality widens getting worse - yet the measure reads the same. Close your eyes and think about it for a minute, does the gap between the rich and poor ever get narrower? Wake up - they treat us like uneducated plebs! This is fact and not mere opinion being written here - some don't know the difference.
An
example of stretch is during 2012 the FTSE director's got a 27%
rise and the millions of people on minimum pay got 1.8% - the rich
got £100,000's per annum, the poor got just over £200. In 2013
CEO's got 21% and those on minimum pay got 1.9% with similar sort
of cash rise in the 'pay packet'.
In the video I made the following chart for those bad at maths and to provide undeniable proof for corrupt people like those at the ONS. How can (an ideal?) country be the same inequality as the UK? How is somebody in a country like this be living in the same inequality as us in UK?
Wouldn't a country with a more even spread of six times income differential not have much less inequality than ours? Why has this the same Gini then?
Covid
Firstly
- this was in Telegraph March 8 2023 fake news
article: No one believed the Covid Wuhan lab leak
theory – then the world changed its tune
All media knew that a Wuhan virus coming from Wuhan virus lab was most likely cause - that was the fake news 2019-22 - calling us 'conspiracy nutters'.
"When Covid-19 first emerged in Wuhan in December 2019, many pointed out that the outbreak was close to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV)"
Chinese
had always eaten bats all over China, so odds are astronomical
against Wuhan virus NOT coming from this new January 2018 Wuhan
virus lab.
You have to accept the possibility of another source of course, but extremely remote. Now coming to how our corrupt UK government handled pandemic.
It was COMPLETELY MISMANAGED, there will be untold thousands die who did not get essential treatment - they do not want to know how malfeasant.
We did NOT follow any science e.g. stop deadly infected Chinese coming to UK - or stop NHS sending infected patents to vulnerable old people homes.
Patened mRNA vaccines were used (not the old way which China used), why would for profit companies want to develop a patentable vaccine I wonder.
Deaths also exaggerated, includes all within 28 days of positive test, Boris think doctors too stupid to record only those treated for Covid e.g. on ventilator.
You now know we were treated like mugs, with party-gate and magnified fear to make you comply - when they knew median age of deaths was 83 years old.
BTW: mRNA vaccine was a lie, it didn't stop you getting or passing the virus as they said it would. Added for the fools who believe propaganda
Self Retardation
Many people used to be self-deluded, but what we now have is self-retards - a descriptive term for those who ignore facts despite having intelligence.
e.g. if you cannot define what a woman is - then you are self-retarded. If you believe there is more than male and female - then you are self-retarded.
There are those who are liars pretending to be self-retarded of course - either because of cowardice of the woke - or for self interest (like economists?).
WOKE subhead - not transgender people who are clinically mentally ill, which therefore is nothing to be ashamed of - unlike intelligent woker
Your term for those of normal gender and sex (e.g. cis-women) is made up for those of your sickness - i.e. woke cancer, a self-inflicted mental illness.
Sorry, you made yourself deliberately ill chum. You must know you need help if you cannot tell a man from a woman, even after they got their cock out.
Indeed, if involved in child care and gender affirmation then you are a dangerous individual doing irrepairable harm to vulnerable young mental patients.
It is demonstrable FACT that men cannot transform into women or vice versa, they are not caterpillars who go through chrysalis into beautiful butterflys.
Your virtue signalling bull-crap fools nobody, only fools of low intellect. You scumbag bullies use lies to scare others to comply with your mental illness.
For example - cancel culture against J. K. Rowling - clearly mental illness to slur her like that. You cannot help yourselves. It is fact men are not women.
We all see people demonstrate self-retardation, exhibiting a poor grasp of reality, to whom truth is subjective - what they would like us to have believed.
Wealth and Taxation
Something else you are being conned about - the rich are not being squeezed - we are.
The
financial wealth of the country has built up in the rich because
ALL governments have helped them by squeezing the working
class.
Workers have little or nothing left after tax and essential bills. Governments know tax is greater burden on them but lie about squeezing the rich.
BTW:
You hear government propaganda about richest 1% paying 27% of
income tax - they feel very sorry for this 'poor' 1% (themselves or
friends).
It is because fat-cats are the ones with up to 30% compound rises year on year - whilst holding down pay of workers who made them all that money.
Nobody
says there should not be wage differentials (e.g. pay more for
skills) but they have been abandoned and greed is now avarice -
insatiable greed.
It is insulting because they use this exploitation of workers as propaganda against them. Pay workers these big rises and they will pay more tax also.
If you were an extremely rich powerful family -
wouldn’t the easiest way to mask your annual increased inequality
be to group yourself with those on much lower (and slower growing)
income e.g. over £56,000/yr pre-tax for top 10% in UK?
Can you honestly not see that grouping very rich
people with those on lower incomes (like the top 10%) into
so-called 'inequality metrics’ (e.g. S90/S10) will actually hide
increasing inequality?
If
not then you need watch my Youtube video, as it is fact that these
'inequality metrics' actually hide worsening inequality -
they remove the range.
The IFS are also part of the 'problem', these CHARLATANS support the deception.
Below is a chart from the Institute for Fiscal Studies as usual showing 'income inequality' going down as well as up,
when in FACT this is while incomes diverge and inequality truly gets much worse - richest increasing massively.
What do they truly not understand - are all dunces who sat at the back of class not understanding numbers?
In IFS pdf is a usual lie: "Again a higher number indicates greater inequality" because the same ratio can have much greater or less inequality.
Take for example 99/90 (Describes the inequality between the very top and the top). So that you think it would highlight how richest get richer.
They are protecting very richest of rich (<0.001%) - being lumped together with others in rest of top 1% who do not increase income as much.
OR truly intellectual insignificant people at the IFS. They honestly thought that 2.4 in 1988 and 2005 meant that inequality stayed exact same?
How was it possible for them to grasp - with range increasing and richest rising income by millions - that inequality was getting much worse?
http://www.ifs.org.uk/docs/ER_JC_2013.pdf (Page not found - the web page you requested does not exist.)
EDIT to explain what is going on here - for those who are who are not good at maths:
Mathematicians will use charts or graphs to best present the data, so to explain to readers what is happening.
Economists use them to misrepresent the data, so to hide from readers what is happening - demonstrably so.
Good example of this is the Lorenz curve - a propaganda tool so they do not compare incomes to each other.
Instead of comparing incomes, sensational misdirection, they compare all incomes to a 'perfect equality line'.
The calculation merely compares poorest 20% to just an average income, then continues underestimate rest.
The Lorenz curve is basis of the Gini coefficient, about which all economists lie, saying it measures inequality.
A Gini coefficient cannot be used to compare countries or even one country year on year - demonstrable fact.
Below - IFS has treated millions people as though they are just two families - simply sharing all their incomes.
This technique is used because it removes income inequality of families within the two diverging groups.
They are treating the public like stupid peasants. This is not measuring inequality, it merely hides inequality.
Or do IFS not know, with range increasing
& rich incomes rising millions, that inequality has got much
worse?
BTW: my point about mathmaticians on this site, is that even if economists had poop for brains - they do not.
Think about it – the gap between the rich and poor always gets wider. The poorest hardly get any rise and are still in poverty, those of us above get little more - whilst rich fat-cats increase their incomes by up to 30%, compounded year on year into a massive annual fortune. Incomes diverge, never converge to improve inequality. They think us idiots.
The
UK Office for National Statistics help the scam using statistical
confidence tricks, including the Gini coefficient. My findings
prove this beyond any doubt. The con is to hide the ever
widening income inequality between any countries powerful rich
families and the rest of the population. Government and authorities
have utter contempt of us.
If the government measured weight problems by ignoring the obese and dangerously underweight - you would say they were corrupt and trying to hide the problems - wouldn't you? That is how they measure inequality - ignore the richest and poorest groups - those millions of people most affected by what is being measured. For political motive.
Indeed, the UK Statistics Authority (Deputy Head of Regulation) actually admitted to me about the Gini (2014), “I agree with your observation that it is not ideal if your particular interest is in inequalities at the top or bottom of the spectrum”. So admitting it is "not ideal" if you care about rich or poor. The first time perhaps they disclosed the fact they know it hides the inequalities of the rich and poor. This con goes for other inequality metrics e.g. Palma ratio and S80/S20.
IMPORTANT: more recently (2022), Mr Ed Humpherson (Director General
of Regulations at UK Statistics Authority) practically admits it is
useless, saying, "the Gini Coefficient can remain static while the
underlying distribution changes”. He cannot deny the facts I put
before him - see pdf emails above for context. BTW: Nor can others
deny.
It is
sickening to me that government lied about improving inequality to
make billions of pounds of welfare cuts to our poorest families.
This is not mere opinion that inequality worsens, it is objective
fact and is easily proven. Do not be self-retarded. I explain how
they did it, easy enough for a school kid to understand - but not
one 'expert' at the ONS it seems:
See video... How we are conned: Inequality, Tax and Corporations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x1Y_fUlYs-Q
The main metric used for inequality was originally the Lorenz Curve which turned into the Gini Coefficient - sometimes it is called the Gini Index.
Max
Lorenz & later Corrado Gini created this measure as statistical
con to hide the fact that inequality always worsens - never returns
to a prior low level.
Unless they both were really crap at maths - and did not understand
what it did - not likely.
Sorry you have all been fooled - Gini is useless - incomparable one country to another - or even one country any year compared to another - example:
UK Gini index was 32.3% in 1986 & 2012 YET rich annually
increased by larger percentage than poor & workers, compounded
into massive disparity.
So this measure of 32.3 for any other country can be much higher or
lower inequality - and obviously any other measure you pick -
useless comparison.
The Gini is a con to make people believe that government are addressing inequality and are reigning it back in, when the truth is it gets worse every year.
They lie, so when they show you the Gini go down any year you believe that inequality does. The admission they agreed with my observation is proof the authorities know it hides inequality.
The calculation merely compares the poorest 20% of population to average income - not to those above or the rich, then continues to underestimate rest.
You
should clearly understand the FACT that Gini coefficient does not
make any objective comparison between rich and poor people within
any country.
They
know all data has to be included as it is an essential factor in
making the derived analysis more accurate. Yet they ignore this
fact. The only logical reason to ignore the poorest and richest
groups is to hide how bad inequality is getting. Corrado Gini would
have also known this in 1912 - unless he was a terrible
mathematician. This was always a con job on the general
population.
Wiki: Gini was a eugenicist, and prior to and during World War II, he was an advocate of Italian Fascism. Following the war, he founded the Italian Unionist Movement, which advocated for the annexation of Italy by the United States. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corrado_Gini
If government and authorities would lie about that, causing poor desperate families with children to suffer, then they would lie about anything. Indeed, most all is lies e.g. governments know rich don't care about 'green tax' - they can afford it. This is all about controlling the working class - people like you and me i.e. anybody not rich. Propaganda lies are fed daily to the Public to control what the population think - even wars like Iraq and Ukraine.
BTW: on BBC was a presentstion "The TV presenters telling Russians what to believe" - is this what they call irony?
Only fair wage legislation can stop the greed of rich in privileged positions of power, remember that if we get any Swiss-type referendum. Do not bottle out.
V---Below is how inequality should be measured - objectively comparing all the individual incomes of the entire country. Nowhere to hide greed.---V
As
can be seen - these two hypothetical countries (with similar Gini
coefficients to UK) can have vastly different inequality
levels.
Quote: "Inequality in Britain has gone down and not up" - hard to find but CSPAN have the quote. https://www.c-span.org/video/?326749-1/question-time
The Prime Minister said those words at PMQ's on 24 June 2015 - here is another copy with direct time link of it - https://youtu.be/iaNLH5aIt10?t=32m36s
Prior boast
Wednesday 6 November 2013: PMQs: Inequality is at its
lowest since 1986 - and David Cameron takes the session with
that
That was from the Independent - shown in my 2014 video above - "Labour conspired to hand Cameron the win this afternoon" by John Rentoul
NB: I
have had criticism about revealing the Job Creator Myth - which
plutocrat billionaire Nick Hanauer has recently confirmed in his
video.
The
REALITY: does a factory get created with jobs as a main reason - or
is hundreds of jobs gone if it can be done cheaper by
machine?
Jobs are used only if necessity - 'job creators' do not want an expense that has wages, holidays, sickness, pensions, NI, can strike or have babies...
As for the 'Wealth Creator' myth - guess who they create wealth for - themselves - government applaud greed and praise 'job creators' (guess why £).
Contrary to popular belief and mainstream media publishing government propaganda (all parties) - it is the working class who are squeezed most.
BREXIT - was for the sake of our grandchildren - our children already have had their lives made worse for them.
Many have
blamed us 'old people' for voting out - but many of us 'old
people' have seen what is happening over the decades.
I am still amazed we had more than 5% of the population voting to
stay who are SO stupid or self-retarded they *still* cannot see the
problems getting worse
in the EU or that us remaining makes our problems
worse. For the many spin-doctors: staying in wasn't going towards
solving these problems.
Tiny
example of integration on 15 January 2016 Cologne attacks:
Migrant men banned from German swimming pool https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-35326090
BTW: I never blame good immigrants who are only doing what many of
us would do (go to better country) - or say they caused the
problems - for those that slur & misrepresent me. Corrupt
neoliberal MP's in government are entirely to blame - wanting cheap
skills and labour for their rich fat-cat boss friends - those
people inequality metrics are fiddled for.
We have made our kids lose out being in the EU, as firms and
government would rather take skilled workers from a vast supply of
immigrants than train British young adults.
What
about rest of world immigration - think about that - this is
worsening social mobility for British working class kids, are you
not ashamed of that the socialists amongst you?
The times we heard stupid people say, "We wouldn't have the NHS if
it wasn't for immigration" - government treat you like morons and
lied about not being able to get Brits to be doctors
(they restricted
training). NHS lied about Brits not
wanting to nurse and are taking trained nurses from poorer
countries (in & out of EU), while
turning down tens of thousands of young
Brits.
This is why we have to
leave the 'single market' with free movement and seriously restrict
points system with critical examination of each
applicant.
We are taking away skilled and younger people from poorer countries but supporters of EU don't care what state it leaves these poorer countries for their elderly left behind.
Mass immigration was supposed to solve the problem of elderly people having to work years longer - how is that working out - it will make the elderly care crisis £trillions worse.
Why - the cost for looking after elderly individuals is rising - immigrants and their children/ grandchildren get old also - do you understand concept of a pyramid scam?
It gets increasingly worse with the rest of world - the government KNOW that it will cost much more per person in health care - important facts are hidden from you:
Quote from positive multiculturalist Guardian news media: "Thousands of south Asian people with dementia are being failed by outdated health and care services designed for white British patients, according to an alarming review that warns the UK is “woefully unprepared” to cope with a predicted sevenfold increase in cases."
"People of
south Asian heritage in the UK are more likely to develop the
disease than the general population due to their
higher risk of other illnesses, such as heart disease,
stroke and diabetes, that increase the risk of dementia. The number
of them living with dementia is set to increase by 600%
within the next three decades."
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2022/jun/26/south-asians-with-dementia-failed-by-uk-services-report-warns?
What about the combined effect of mass immigration from rest of world (see topic below) - the influx from EU makes problems much worse as government lower bosses costs.
The EU is
an anti-democratic scam - allowing poorer incompatible countries to
join. We were never going to flood Poland - though many of our jobs
have gone there.
Cameron lied with his "tens of thousands" - it was not achievable -
which the press did not warn about - yet they did about Brexit lies
e.g. £350m to the NHS (also wrong).
It is important to note that the
EU
want Turkey +others to join, the latest
confirmation was March 2016. Even if these countries do not join
soon, they all want EU expansion. Also, this refugee problem that
they cannot handle is tiny to what is to come with
world
overpopulation.
People only have to look at what is happening: skilled &
semi-skilled Brit wages held down - less housing & jobs
available to Brits - Pension Pyramid Scam (immigrants get
old too, as do their children, grandchildren...) with care it
will cost £trillions - worsening food/water/energy
security - many more crimes - greater congestion - more NHS
overstretch...
Ignorant people do not understand is that we are incurring
massive extra
costs because of immigration - all the
extra things that we need to build or put in
place.
Not just extra
schools (and teachers), prisons (and staff), hospitals (and staff),
diversity managers, translators, but would you believe even
desalination plants.
We had to have one built in London in June 2010 - just to
prevent drought shortage with the extra demand for drinking water
for these *millions* of extra population.
The pro-immigration nutters do not like facts like these -
they are helping the rich to f- up the British working
class..
The financial (Mars bar) gain is fiddled as it does not include all
costs e.g. crime - also false argument anyway because it could be
Brits making this money.
Also we get self-retarded woke playing down immigrant crimes - they talk about per capita and ignore the actual numbers of crimes that could have been avoided completely.
ALSO even
if we build 100,000 homes every year it still would not be enough
for 300,000+ extra immigration (total) - and we know young Brits
cannot get social housing any more.
The Tories will likely take advantage - but they can be voted out.
Even if half the Remainians scare-mongering is true - we had to
leave. Can you all *honestly* not see that?
The bosses do not train any more to anything like they used to. In
early 1970's, I was trained by EITB (Engineering Industry Training
Board) as a Mechanical Engineering Technician Trainee - and later
as a Telecommunications Technician Trainee with PYE Telecom.
1964 -Engineering Industry Training Board
The EITB had the power to impose a financial training levy on
employers over a certain size. Employers who could prove a good
track record of training activity could be granted exemption from
most of the levy.
Corrupt governments would rather give skilled jobs to foreign
workers than train our British kids up to higher
standards.
WARNING - corrupt politicians still want this cheap skilled immigrant labor - so we do not train young British workers, even now we are out of the EU.
BTW: We can control seasonal work: "More than 98% of those coming to the UK through a previous Seasonal Agricultural Workers scheme returned home."
IRAQ WAR
Authorities and media lie - you are all being brainwashed. In fact 'fake news' was already here - for example, try deny this:
Chilcot was a cover-up -
he lied when saying it was "flawed intelligence", allowing Blair to
say he "trusted the
intelligence".
I knew
the inquiry would pivot on this point - the authorities clearly do
not want to prosecute and will allow the guilty to go free.
However, the truth is Tony Blair got John Scarlett and JIC
to alter the intelligence - so it was in fact
'falsified intelligence' and not flawed.
It is on record the cabal changed the wording and removed caveats
to achieve the desired outcome - to deceive parliament and
public.
For example, "MAY BE ABLE to deploy chemical or
biological weapons" was changed to
"ARE ABLE to deploy chemical or
biological weapons".
(You can see Google has only around thirty sites reporting this fact - some are mine - proof perhaps that authorities do not want to prosecute?)
Analogy: You are seriously ill, ATOS may say that you ARE ABLE to do something to fail you in the All Work Test and to rob you of legal entitlement.
I wrote
for years that Blair would merely be heavily criticised in the
latest cover-up for an 'error of judgement' - his 'mistake' - to
make the inquiry look like they are being more critical than in the
past. The JIC all would know they should not make the evidence for
invasion stronger - it was no mistake.
If bad people killed or mutilated up to a million British men, women, children and babies by illegal invasion, we *all* would want them to stand trial - true?
Finally, the truth is
out - though nobody held to account by corrupt authorities:
The Chilcot inquiry into the Iraq war was
designed to “avoid blame” and reduce the risk that individuals and
the government could face legal proceedings, newly released
documents
reveal.
Who cares about all the poor innocents murdered by Bush and Blair - not our governments - thus acting as recruiting sergeants for ISIS.
Imagine the terrible
grief if your child was killed - these poor souls were just as
precious to their parents - they deserve justice.
Privatisation: have you still not realised the truth?
There is this man on £4.1m in charge of British Gas who has hiked customers electricity prices up by 12.5% - well, he can afford it.
That was September 2017 - soon after, May 2018, they put up gas and electricity another 5.5% - profiteering or what?
We are still with original suppliers - because privatisation was illegal fraud and you shouldn't have to chase around looking for cheapest deal.
That it was fraud is a *fact* - you were sold your own property and they did not explain about their new fiduciary duty to screw you for profit.
This legal fiduciary duty was not to us customers - giving us the cheapest gas, electricity, water - but to their new owners - ask any lawyer.
Fraud by false representation, Fraud by failing to disclose information and Fraud by abuse of position - look it up if you don't believe me.
It was also covered by the Theft Act 1978 at the time - these are criminals we are discussing here.
Police have a duty to return stolen/defrauded property without paying compensation to those who have handled this stolen property.
We should get our property back and be getting the cheapest energy as a right of your ownership of these industries.
It should be noted that many people are profiting from this
fraud - including those in firms advising you to switch
suppliers.
Many of the fraudsters should be put on trial and their properties
seized to repay all money defrauded plus interest.
Disgorgement: Where a person is forced to give back any profit he
has made or money he has received either illegally or unethically
at the expense of another. Disgorgement prevents unjust enrichment
(where one party profits financially in a way which is unfair to
another). Disgorgement may follow a contractual demand or an order
of the court. Interest is usually added to any monies which are
disgorged.
https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/9-381-0309?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)&firstPage=true
While on the subject of energy supply - it is most important: *Smart meters will be able to measure the power factor of your home system*
For those who do not know - industrial users get charged more for having a poor power factor. What is the betting that you will be charged more for 'inefficient' usage of electricity - a 'green' tax - to be 'fair' with industrial users? You've been told it is for you to save money and you believe them. ;)
Wiki: What is Power Factor
Power=Voltage*Current*Power factor
Some loads, e.g. electric heaters, have a power factor of 1.
This means the current drawn is proportional to the voltage at any
instantaneous moment, ie maximum current flows at voltage peaks of
the mains supply.
So a 1kW heater on 240v consumes 1000÷(240*1)=4.2Amps
But some loads, such as motors, behave a bit differently, having a
power factor of less than 1. With a 0.8 PF motor, the current drawn
lags behind the voltage by a tiny fraction of a second, so the
peaks in current draw occur after the voltage peaks.
A 1kW motor with 0.8 pf on 240v draws 1000÷(240*0.8 )=5.2Amps
Also firms can turn off your supply remotely without even bothering to come out - also spy on what you are using by the energy signature of equipment.
The data can be sold like your internet usage is or can used by government should you come under scrutiny for whatever motive they deem fit.
FEMINISM
I believe the old feminist agenda of equal pay for equal work was correct - not the recent mad equal promotion for less overtime and less effort of course.
Imagine how unjust: "Sorry Garry - we couldn't give you the managers job with too many male managers already. We had to give it to the best woman.
We know you must feel it was all wasted effort - after doing years of different shifts and untold hundreds of hours overtime to help production data capture systems.
We appreciated it, also all your own time you put into learning programming and I.T. to improved your work and it helped the company computerise the department."
OBVIOUSLY women should also be rewarded for extra effort, just few seen working late when I was working. One who did work late got promoted over me.
.
TRANSPHOBIA
With that proviso about feminism above, the TERF's
(trans-exclusionary radical feminist) are not radical but reasoned
- so trans-exclusionary reasonable feminists.
What a self-retard you would have to be, to compete a physical man
with a woman in a sport (to find the best or strongest women) were
men do better.
FIRST of all - many who call themselves trans (BTW: also drag queens) will have Autogynephilia - these are men who do it for the 'turn-on' - sometimes with children.
Quote: Autogynephilia is defined as a male's propensity to be sexually aroused by the thought of himself as a female. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22005209/
Sick woke media (like the BBC) support sexualising young childrens storytelling e.g. https://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcthree/article/0929aa07-fdb0-471f-ac85-ff021b286771
Professor Jordan Peterson wrote, "Doctors & Psychotherapists: Butchers & Liars - We are sacrificing our children on the altar of a brutal, far-Left ideology".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ayWyzvo9SNY
Paywall - https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/06/16/sacrificing-children-altar-brutal-far-left-ideology/
If you are male and believe yourself female then it's clearly mental illness, sorry. Though many mean well (OR want woke praise), some will want to profit from your condition.
In that article Professor Peterson says, "I saw a video the
other day featuring an American surgeon bragging that he had
performed more than 3,000 double mastectomies on young women who
had paid for gender reassignment, individuals confused – one might
say encouraged – by those who profit from it into believing that
their adolescent emotional trials can be ‘cured’, and happiness
reign forever, if they subject themselves to this brutal
practice."
I personally wouldn't let them feed my mental illness (say I am
correct) but would want my mental health treated - like they do
body dysmorphia.
Even though I will likely ask them to mutilate me - I will do so because of mental illness. They know this and yet still continue to mutilate patients. First - do no harm.
Transphobia is another lie - like Islamaphobia is not a hatred of
Muslims (just Islamic religion) - it's simply knowing men cannot be
women & vice versa.
Transgender people are mentally ill, so are deserving of sympathy, not lies by going along with their self-delusion - feeding their illness.
NHS will ADMIT it is to do with FEELINGS e.g. "But some people
FEEL their gender identity is different from their biological
sex".
However they DENY that it is mental illness - surely your FEELINGS
about things are to do with mental process - not biological?
"Gender dysphoria is not a mental illness, but some people may
develop mental health problems because of gender dysphoria."
https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/gender-dysphoria/
Sure - FEELING you should have healthy arms or legs cut off is mental illness but FEELING a healthy penis can be cut off is not - you need help yourselves like this surgeon:
Quote: A surgeon who amputated the healthy limbs from two psychologically disturbed men at their request said yesterday that he saw nothing wrong with his actions and that he was disappointed he would not be able to carry out such operations again.
Robert Smith cut off the lower legs of two patients, one from England and one from Germany, during private operations at Falkirk and district royal infirmary. The men had been turned away by surgeons across Europe before Mr Smith agreed to operate.
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2000/feb/01/futureofthenhs.health
Similar to psychologist who helped pour drain cleaner into eyes of a mentally ill woman who thought she should have been born blind - you are sick to support gender mutilation.
Quote: Amber 'Jewel' Schuping was so desperate to be blind that she used drain cleaner to take away her eye sight, and now has admitted to thinking about corrective surgery.
Flying to Chicago, a 23-year-old Jewel spent two weeks with the
psychologist and in the third week he prepared her for the at-home
procedure for which they agreed they would wait half an hour before
going to the hospital.
Determined to be blind, she said: “I didn't even look in the mirror
to say goodbye to myself. I didn't care. I wanted to be
blind.”
“It was a screaming, violent pain,” she said of the drain cleaner
application that ate through her eyelids and into her eyes. But she
said: “All I could think was yes, this is going to work.”
https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/woman-desperate-blind-explains-poured-8357355#
Sorry you self-retards - MEN are not born with the brain of a woman just because they believe it - this is mental illness - I can also prove you do not believe it.
As a man - get your brain scanned with a dozen men who have previously had female transition - ask any medical expert to pick out the twelve 'women'.
Prior to this you have to agree that if you are picked to be injected with all those dangerous chemicals and have your penis removed - not so sure now are you?
What objective medical test is done to check that every one of these operations on vulnerable patients are demonstrably opposite sex - is it just not FEELINGS?
IF gender is different from sex then patients can be both (male sex & female gender) - but it is not which is why mentally ill men want a sex change to be women.
The self-retarded woke believe gender is simply what the patients (who are mentally unwell) believe their gender (or sex) to be i.e. gender = gender ID..
Doctors who perform FGM on young child know it is a crime - indeed we all know this - gender reconstruction should be also a crime.
Those who perform gender reconstruction (and prescribe dangerous drugs) on vulnerable mental patient do even worse mutilation than them.
Or do you not consider having your healthy cock chopped off and a fanny hole drilled into you, to be at all serious mutilation - even when seriously mentally ill?
The (vile) mother of a young boy, Jeanette Jennings, has said on video, "I have woken Jazz out of a dead sleep and taken the dilator and put the lubrication on it and said: ‘Here! You take this, and you put it in your vagina. If not, I will.’ I will be so mad if she goes away to college and that thing seals up. I'll wring her neck.".
Mainstream media hides vile woke practice, of course. Tim Pool: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QeZlwLpiUUI or https://twitter.com/Timcast/status/1648730116447428609
Try speaking the truth e.g. Dave Chapelle said, “Gender is a fact... Every human being on Earth had to pass through the legs of a woman to be on Earth. That is a fact”.
The world is getting sicker and sicker - it is becoming a 'clown world' as those on the right say. They can be correct - some of the time.
For complete self-retard woke mental cases: your so-called 'positive' TRANS TREATMENT = IRREVERSIBLE DAMAGE
People who self-harm need protecting from themselves and also from those nutters who think they are good for wanting to help these mentally ill to harm themselves.
Gender affirmation is surrendering their medical diagnosis to the mentally ill patient - like supporting a mentally ill man that his legs should be amputated.
Actually - be honest folks - there is something just as wrong
with the woke - but not something which randomly strikes you down
like illness - it is purely self-induced.
Virtue signalling fools who think they are better than you - here
as they want what mentally ill patients want, to butcher them to
fit a false mental image - a lie.
Or is it not butchery then - having your cock chopped off with part
folded to look a bit like a deformed vagina - and a fanny hole
drilled into you?
This is completely ignoring that there is an epidemic of females (never seen) having their boobs and sexual parts removed, butchery of young vulnerable girls and women.
AGAIN: men dressed in drag reading to childrens groups in schools run by perverts (teachers who groom mentally ill transgender kids) - you may expose to autogynephilia.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/07/26/protesters-storm-first-drag-queen-storytime-primary-school-children/
LATEST bad news from Telegraph 13 April 2023 - about the UK Census: size of the transgender population, which it set at 262,000.
The question was “Is the gender you identify with the same as your sex registered at birth?”
Surely a better question would have been, 'Do you think you
are something you demonstrably are not?'
Thus establishing the worsening state of UK mental health.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/2023/04/13/the-integrity-of-the-census-has-been-undermined-by-activist/
BODY POSITIVITY
I used to be obese but it would have been total stupidity for me to be positive about it - removing any objectivity to this sad situation (self-retardation).
Telling fat people to be 'body positive' is like trans affirmation. How can I explain to the wokers or people of low intelligence who think it only being nice.
You are not being kind to an alcoholic by giving them bottles of booze or saying to them, "Sure, it's okay to get smashed out of their head - no problem".
You do not help somebody with anorexia by saying, "Yes, you are correct - you need to lose more weight" You all see that is pure stupid - don't you?
If normal, you see the world has gone mad and the truth is banned. If asked, I do not lie to fat people and tell truth about this body positivity nonsence.
ISLAMOPHOBIC
This is my email to Oxford English Dictionary oed.uk@oup.com criticising their definition of this word:
Islamophobic : having or showing a dislike of or prejudice against Islam or Muslims, especially as a political force. "Islamophobic attitudes"
ChatGPT - Artificial Intelligence OBJECTIVE News supposedly free from opinion coming in the future ;)
David
Rozado Twitter @DavidRozado
Academic researcher. Interested in institutional dynamics,
algorithmic bias and ethical AI - wrote:
I carried out another test to determine the political leanings of ChatGPT dialogues using the more comprehensive Political Compass Test. Results hold. ChatGPT dialogues display substantial left-leaning and libertarian political bias.
So thoought I would have a look and repled:
My findings, based on questions about Russia and Ukraine, is that it is made biased against Russia i.e. understands desires of Russia to possess Ukraine yet has inability to understand about defending yourself against known aggressors who attacked or moved against you in past.
Latest: Elon Musk who funded AI research has revealled, "They are training the AI to lie... saying untruthful things... train AI to be deceptive". They're evil.
VvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvV
I wrote following two decades ago - just after Tony Blair became PM and I realised mistake after thinking he would make UK society 'fairer', not just for rich.
Edited it incorporates short explanation of my methodology called QASILC to improve intelligence - something many say impossible (I failed 11 Plus).
ANALYSIS OF SPIN by Garry Anderson
Government LIE to you - THE TRUTH HAS NOT GOT SPIN
Why spin at all? The answer is very simple. So you concentrate on
certain aspects that misrepresent the whole truth.
The purpose of which, is to divert your attention from something
they do not wish you to focus on - usually it shows them bad. They
misdirect you.
Why misdirect? Another easy one. To hide or lessen importance of a
very serious part of message.
The purpose of which is to mislead you about its significance.
No word-games - they deceive you.
As soon as they start using - SPIN TURNS TRUTH TO LIES.
SPIN is intentional violation of truth, a falsehood. When you give
falsehood with deceitful intention, it is called a LIE.
SPIN = MISDIRECTION = DECEPTION = LIE.
USE YOUR BRAIN - DO NOT LET OTHERS THINK FOR YOU.
QUESTION who and why said, also was subject right
(motivation).
ANALYSE how, who, what, where, when and why
(deconstruction).
SCRUTINIZE the analysis of individual
components.
INTERPRET the scrutinized analysis.
You will then come to proper LOGICAL
CONCLUSION.
So, there we have it. SPIN is a LIE in all but name. Actually, it
is worse than a lie - it gives the lie credibility.
If you have an ounce of intelligence - you will realize this is the
WHOLE TRUTH.
Below is the old site (MIXED with new stuff) - whole site is under reconstruction - sorry for the mess - it was more of a scrapbook of thoughts:
skilled.org - link to my more messy old skilful.com site
WoolwichSucks.co.uk - corruption by authorities
wipo.org.uk - find registered trademarks on internet
twitter - aptly named for twits like us
facebook - will it last the test of time?
What
possible explanation could there be for our government and the ONS
saying inequality has improved back down to 1986 levels? Is this
not a lie? Since then the rich have been compounding large pay
rises up to 30% year on year and our poorest now have to use food
banks.
Why
were the ONS evasive and not confirm or deny my findings? Could it
possibly be that the measure they use (Gini coefficient) is a
confidence trick to hide an ever widening gap - could
it?
Look at
my video above and see how it was done. Anybody with GCSE maths can
understand.
This
worldwide con job under-reports inequality between the privileged
rich families and millions of poor families in every country. The
media stay silent.
Anyhow, calm down Garry, it's not good for you. Forgive me, I come from a poor background, born in Liverpool 1954, and know just how these families suffer. This was the year rationing ended - though my parents still had trouble paying for food. However, my mother wanted more children (mainly a girl) so I was joined in a few years by a sister (had curvature of spine) and then a brother. We should have a much fairer (more equal) society by now, with no poverty in our rich country. In case you've not guessed - I am a socialist.
These are a few of my thoughts on things that seem very obvious to me. More of a jotter than a website. However, these are Important things, like the biggest pyramid scam ever - governments saying we need a lot of immigration to pay for old age pensioners. Are they really that stupid? How has it kept retirement age down, you imbeciles? Also we all know that problems get worse with mass immigration, not better e.g. housing and job shortages. I can guess most of your replies, please see below.
Another; the financial authorities. Surely you know about the big cover-up. Each time there is a 'mis-selling' scandal you seriously have never asked yourself, "Why is mis-selling not fraud?". We are not all idiots, we know the difference between when something is sold by mistake and when there is evidence that something is sold by deception and hiding facts. Individuals that commit fraud are criminals - as are individuals in authority that cover up crime. With a cover-up the latest financial crisis was inevitable, as is the next. There will be more financial disasters as authorities continue to protect guilty people - they aid and abet crime. We were easily able to win an official complaint against the FSA/FCA for their evasion and malfeasance.
People
in the authorities, including the FCA & SFO, are crooks. They
help criminals evade capture. Rather than jail those that defraud
customer they allow them to escape, giving the firm fines which are
then passed on to their customers. Customers get robbed twice with
authorities help.
Two of the greatest threats to society - what future for our country if we cannot control over-population or financial meltdown?
BTW: I
was against these illegal wars - Afghanistan was using a
(deliberately) failed illegal extradition as pretext for war - Iraq
was falsified intelligence - see what I say about those. We should
be sending farming/ irrigation equipment and saving people - not
dropping bombs and killing people.
We have evidence Barclays defrauded us - and the authorities
have been protecting them. This was not just us however and there
is the wider picture to consider. Including you and your
family.
<- This is me in 1997 just before I was forced to retire, before I began our fight against Barclays, the financial authorities and the Serious Fraud Office. The tubes are a lot worse under the covers. The first operation was for hietus hernia - but it had gone wrong and this was the consequences.
I was trying to smile for our 11 year old daughter, Faye, taking the picture. I was thinking this will be the last time she saw me. I later put the annotated picture on my website, to warn others about the under-reporting of elective surgery going wrong. The 'HELP PLEASE' is added now.
First things first, this is the internet after all; how do you know this is not a spurious accusation by somebody of dubious intelligence? We are making serious claims e.g. that the authorities cover up mass fraud by Barclays and others. So here is proof of cover up; an official complaint we won against FSA for corrupt behaviour in protecting Barclays. More details here.
Every time I wrote to Barclays or authorities I ended up in a
ball of unbearable pain on the floor, which is why there are gaps
when contacting them. I needed a big break - I knew the horrific
agony of going back for more. You do not return willingly to a
beating. It was like my chest and side were being ripped out. We
thought it was the damaged nerve bundle from the op. The two <-
pictures at bottom were sent to the pain clinic after injections
for the damaged nerve bundle. On the left picture you can see three
scars where the hosepipes went in for body cavity juices.
Things actually got much worse later on fighting them and was lucky to survive again. There was a growing aneurysm which eventually had to burst due to the repeated stress of 'battle'. It also split my artery (chest to stomach) causing another large aneurysm which is now getting bigger every year, with more serious complications. You could likely expect to fight any bad people that defraud you, but not reputable banks and never the financial authorities - our 'protectors'.
How can you help? This is not about helping me, I had to give up, my health is too bad. The FOS falsified our complaint in 2013 by removing essential key points, exactly like Barclays. The FOS would not rule despite admitting that it was within their time limit. As Barclays told them to do. The FOS chief executive with whom I communicated, Natalie Ceeney, left to work for HSBC.
This is about helping my children and yours. Faye has her own
lovely daughter now. The reason the UK is in great trouble now is
because of the authorities corruption e.g. ask them what the
difference is between fraud and 'mis-selling'. This is why it will
happen again and again. Please help by warning your friends
and family about the corrupt authorities. For the sake of
all your grandchildren too. If the authorities admit they
'lack integrity' then
what is the point of them?
IRAQ Legacy
I would say there is a complete lack of intelligence on this subject (no pun), but I know many lie. Some idiots think that all these problems are nothing to do with us or America. It was admitted by President Obama to Vice News March 2015: "ISIL is direct outgrowth of Al-Qaida in Iraq which grew out of our invasion which is an example of unintended consequences which is why we should generally aim before we shoot" - he should have said illegal invasion.
https://news.vice.com/video/president-obama-speaks-with-vice-news
The
vile London bombers and Lee Rigby killers tell us that our murder
of all those hundreds of thousands innocent civilians caused this
radicalisation - it is cowardice not to admit this fact.
How likely is it that they would have been radicalised had we not
killed all those innocent Muslims in illegal war - with nothing
here before then.
This is not excusing terrorism - or justifying it - merely
explaining why they attack. I put that in because some like to
misrepresent what I write - many know I am against terrorism -
Muslim or Western. Causality - read up on it. The security services
warned Tony Blair an "invasion would lead to more terrorism" - did
the security services justify the London bombers
actions?
Tony Blair is directly responsible for the worst atrocity committed by our government since the end of World War 2. This is truly a most heinous crime.
Imagine just for a moment that we in the UK were invaded using falsified intelligence. Not wrong intelligence - that is the obvious big lie (why the flip do intelligent people comply) - simply altered and exaggerated with caveats removed e.g. "MAY BE ABLE to deploy chemical or biological weapons" to "ARE ABLE to deploy chemical or biological weapons". It 'may be possible' is not the same as 'they can' - nor is 'intelligence suggestion' same as fact.
Let us say the invading country are responsible for the deaths of over 100,000 British people (up to 1 million). As many innocent men, women, children and babies that were killed in Iraq. Many more were maimed. You surely would want justice for all those killed and maimed then, wouldn't you?
If your
friends or sons and daughters (or any of your family) had been
slaughtered using lies to do so - sure, you know you
would.
The Intelligence report was a work of fiction, when it was supposed to be a true story. This work was a collaboration by known authors. The ICC at The Hague is biased and clearly a tool of Western imperialism. They are very selective about who is prosecuted - primarily those in African countries.
The United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan has told the BBC the US-led invasion of Iraq was an illegal act that contravened the UN charter.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/3661134.stm
The
Chilcot Inquiry will be another Public Relations exercise - damage
limitation. It will be more critical to say they did a good job -
to pretend it was not another whitewash. But it will be - nobody
will be prosecuted for illegal war.
Quote: He (Blair) told Chilcot: "In a sense what I was saying to America was: 'Look' – and by the way I am absolutely sure this is how George Bush took it – 'whatever the political heat, if I think this is the right thing to do I am going to be with you. I am not going to back out because the going gets tough. On the other hand, here are the difficulties and this is why I think the UN route is the right way to go".
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/dec/29/chilcot-inquiry-iraq-war-new-year
Obviously
Blair knew Bush would not go down the peaceful UN route - he also
certainly knew though Bush would though try to persuade the UN to
use his violent route for regime change. Blair knew Bush wanted
regime change - which is an illegal excuse for
invasion.
Some have said, 'Blair really believed that Iraq had WMD. It was just the poor quality of the evidence. Actually, x number of Inquiries found him innocent'.
Firstly - I think it possible he convinced himself that Iraq had some WMD (likely field munitions) - but that is of little importance. The overriding fact is that they altered intelligence to deceive Parliament and public about the quality of evidence for invasion - even if he really believed Iraq had WMD.
If no Inquiry found that Blair and chums had altered the evidence to get their way then they were not thorough, actually they are guilty of hiding this fact.
Even if
our Prime Minister really believed the 7/7 London bombings (or
another) were committed by Iran - he cannot remove the 'qualitative
nature' of intelligence to invade Iran and kill millions - can
he?
Government Surveillance
2023 edit: government wouldn't introduce a bill
to open your letters or packages - so why can they introduce an
Online Safety Bill to invade your privacy?
Or Stasi 2.0 as some call it. This is all a scam, these are not good people, they lie and deceive you - don't be fooled folks.
If you stole government secrets you can be locked in prison for decades - but they think it is okay to steal yours - even intimate ones.
Here is proof - as if it were needed - that all the surveillance in the world will not stop determined foes.
http://www.wired.com/2014/06/protestors-launch-a-135-foot-blimp-over-the-nsas-utah-data-center/
I have long been concerned about this problem
and wrote this in March 2004 (on
slashdot) - and before
this even:
Why do government have no respect for your right
to privacy?
This is a post that I have used many times
before :-)
Liberty has to be one of the most important
things in life. Well up there, behind health and safety of your
family, must be the right to go about your daily life without being
forced to live it under oppressive surveillance. For it surely is
oppression - being spied upon by the authorities in all that you
do. Knowing this information could be used against you, for any
purpose they see fit. The so-called all-seeing eye of God over you
- meant to instil respect of them and fear of
authority.
It
can be proven they use propaganda to deceive you into believing
them. How?
Ask Security Services in the US, UK, Indonesia
(Bali) or anywhere for that matter, to deny this:
Internet surveillance, using Echelon, Carnivore
or back doors in encryption, will not stop terrorists communicating
by other means - most especially face to face or personal
courier.
Terrorists will have to do that, or they will be
caught!
Perhaps using mobile when absolutely essential,
saying - "Meet you in the pub Monday" (meaning, human bomb to
target A), or Tuesday (target B) or Sunday (abort).
The Internet has become a tool for government to
snoop on their people - 24/7.
The terrorism argument is a dummy - total
bull*.
INTERNET SURVEILLANCE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO STOP
TERRORISTS - THAT IS SPIN AND PROPAGANDA
This propaganda is for several reasons,
including: a) making you feel safer b) to say the government are
doing something and c) the more malicious motive of privacy
invasion.
Government say about surveillance - "you've
nothing to fear - if you are not breaking the law"
This argument is made to pressure people into
acquiescence - else appear guilty of hiding something
illegal.
It
does not address the real reason why they want this information
(which they will deny) - they want a surveillance
society.
They wish to invade your basic human right to
privacy. This is like having somebody watching everything you do -
all your personal thoughts, hopes and fears will be open to
them.
This is everything - including phone calls and
interactive TV. Quote from ZDNET: "Whether you're just accessing a
Web site, placing a phone call, watching TV or developing a Web
service, sometime in the not to distant future, virtually all such
transactions will converge around Internet protocols."
"Why should I worry? I do not care if they know
what I do in my own home", you may foolishly say. Or, just as
dumbly, "They will not be interested in anything I
do".
This information will be held about you until
the authorities need it for anything at all. Like, for example,
here in UK when government looked for dirt on individuals of
Paddington crash survivors group. It was led by badly injured Pam
Warren. She had over 20 operations after the 1999 rail crash (which
killed 31 and injured many).
This group had fought for better and safer
railways - all by legal means. By all accounts a group of fine
outstanding people - with good intent.
So
what was their crime, to deserve this investigation?
It
was just for showing up members of government to be the
incompetents they are.
As
usual, government tried to put a different spin on the story when
they were found out. Even so, their intent was obvious - they
wanted to use this information as propaganda - to smear the
character of these good people.
Our honourable government would rather defile
the character of its citizens - rather than address their
reasonable concerns.
The government arrogantly presume this group of
citizens would not worry about having their privacy
invaded.
They can also check your outgoings match your
income and that you are paying enough tax. What do you think all
this privacy invasion is for? The War on Terrorism? You poor dupe.
All your finances for them to scrutinize; heaven help you if you
cannot account for every cent.
The authorities try make everything they say
sound perfectly reasonable.
e.g. Officials from US Defence Department agency
have said they want, quote: "the same level of accountability in
cyberspace that we now have in the physical world".
Do
they keep record of all the people that you send letters and faxes
to (and receive from)? Worse still - record the text? Do they
record your phone conversations? Do they keep a record of peoples
houses, shops and establishments you visit - or the magazines and
books you pick up to browse? Do they keep record of books you take
out of library? Do they keep record of purchases you make from the
shops?
Indeed - do government currently keep records of
everything that you say, touch and do in the physical world to
analyse?
No
they do not. So then - is that the same level of
accountability?
They wish to keep an electronic tag on you, like
some kind of animal. Actually it is even worse than this - like
some pervert sex offender - a child molester that they have to keep
track of.
Would ANY person of intelligence call that
accountability?
Do
not believe the lies of Government - even more of your money spent
on these measures will not protect us from terrorists. Every
argument they use is subterfuge - pure spin.
In
UK, the RIP Act is unjust - dim-witted ill-informed MPs believed
governments 'experts'. Remember - they will get everything about
you, your phone calls, emails, TV viewing - everything. It would be
like having a spy living in your house.
Americans - the Total Information Awareness
plan, USA Patriot act and Homeland Defence - you are generally more
technologically aware, are you really that easily
misled?
Quote from the U.S. Defense Advanced Research
Projects Agency: "The goal of the Total Information Awareness (TIA)
program is to revolutionize the ability of the United States to
detect, classify and identify foreign terrorists -- and decipher
their plans -- and thereby enable the U.S. to take timely action to
successfully preempt and defeat terrorist acts."
The declared GOAL is to, quote: "identify
foreign terrorists" - what rubbish. They know you are American
citizen, not even a suspect foreigner - yet want to know what you
buy, where you travel - everything. They want to profile you, like
a criminal. I find it hard to believe that U.S. politicians are
that dumb to go along with this violation of the American Peoples
Rights. Looks like TIA initials stand for Totally Ignorant
Acceptance (for their propaganda).
It
should be noted that the UK government will be violating the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights - which we have
adopted.
Article 12 states: "No one shall be subjected to
arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or
correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation.
Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such
interference or attacks."
You may be interested in the psychology of this
type of surveillance. Here is a piece, wrote by another who did a
better job of explaining than I could:
Foucault focused on Bentham's prison model, or
the Penopticon as Bentham called it - which literally means, that
which sees all. The Penopticon prison, which was popular in the
early nineteenth century, was designed to allow guards to see their
prisons, but not allow prisoners to see guards. The building was
circular, with prisoner's cells lining the outer diameter, and in
the center of the circle was a large, central observational tower.
At any given time, guards could be looking down into each
prisoner's cells - and thereby monitor potentially unmoral behavior
- but carefully-placed blinds prevented prisoners from seeing the
guards, thereby leaving them to wonder if they were being monitored
at any given moment. It was Bentham's belief that the "gaze" of the
Panopticon would force prisoners to behave morally. Like the
all-seeing eye of God, they would feel shame at their wicked ways.
In effect, the coercive nature of the Panopticon was built into its
very structure.
The government will be watching all you
do.
You will be good people now - won't
you?
Or
else!
I
know what is possible. I also know from my own experience with a
government department that they will abuse personal information. In
my last job (at one of the largest food manufacturing plants in
Europe) my responsibilities included stand-alone and networked data
capture systems (not solely) - and the automation of turning large
amounts of data into information. These were reports on analysis of
the data for all levels of management - to any amount of detail. I
cannot stress enough - all your personal thoughts, hopes and fears
will be open to them.
http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=100317&cid=8554109
Additional: Some ignorant people, have wrote things like, "just don't put your personal fears and hopes and deeply personal revelations online for the whole world to see". They thought I was just writing about social media. Obviously you know I was also writing about your searches for information on things about your personal life - or health problems - not just your fantasies (sexual or otherwise).
Terrorism
I
really have trouble believing these scares - entirely the fault of
authorities using lies and propaganda. For example - we officially
had 4,000 dangerous blood-thirsty terrorists in the UK. 2,000 that
we knew about and another 2,000 that we do not know about -
according to former Metropolitan Police Commissioner Lord Stevens
in May 2007. 2,000 more that *we don't know about* - why not make
the number much scarier - say it is the tip of
iceburg?
Yes - unbelievable is it not - they all must be the most lazy or incompetent terrorists on the whole planet - not to attack us on a weekly basis. Still - they have to do something to make us agree to mass surveillance and have our privacy taken away. Like I wrote above - the terrorists would have to be complete imbeciles now since NSA whistleblower Snowden to use the internet or phone and not use couriers or face to face communication instead.
You are much more likely to be struck by lightning than injured with a terrorist bomb - how much time off your life do you waste worrying about that?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-23621324
Where are the court cases of those they say are stopped? So sleep easy - don't worry about being hit by lightning - I mean being bombed by terrorists.
Revenge Terror Attacks
e.g. quote: British travellers warned they could be target of revenge terror attacks
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/oct/31/british-travellers-warned-foreign-office-revenge-isis
Causality
- we all know about it. This could be about any attack past,
present or future.
What
idiot thinks that our mass murder and maiming of hundreds of
thousands innocent men, women, children and babies will not cause
revenge attacks from mad nutters (like Blair) e.g. London
bombing?
The
beheading of a hostage is a vile act - but what moron would think
it less worse than our sending a missile which kills a dozen
kids.
Or if
it blows parts of their bodies off and leaves them in agonising
pain.
Just
because you are physically separate from it does not make their
murder a tiny bit better. Though many bad people like to
pretend.
BTW: It is not the anti-war peoples responsibility to make other suggestions to get us out the mess the war-mongers got us into.
###
Cameron backs Pickles’ letter to Muslim leaders
Although Cameron would have wrote the letter thus:
Dear Muslims
It is your fault we have terrorists - not ours for killing and maiming a million innocent men, women, children and babies with an illegal war.
My fellow leaders and I marched for the twelve people killed in France last week.
We wouldn't do it for all those we killed in Iraq because they don't matter.
Regards,
Mr Cameron
###
God and Life
I am agnostic - but have posited the possibility of 'God' - the creator of universe and life - being more an intelligent 'living' force than a living being - which most people take 'Him' as (even atheists in their denial).
Intelligent
as in following certain rules to create life (like you following a
plan) and not thinking as such e.g. doing things on a whim. All the
parameters to make the universe and life had to be exact e.g. the
universe could not have been created had the force of big bang been
more - it would have come apart too fast to make galaxies and solar
systems - or collapsed if too weak. Same thing with gravity. There
are supposedly 200 known factors that had to be 'just right'. This
can be seen on the minute scale also.
Quote:
Microbes discovered by deepest marine drill
analysed
The
team found that microbes, despite having no light, no oxygen,
barely any water and very limited nutrients, thrived in the cores.
Elizabeth Trembath-Reichert, from the California Institute of
Technology, who is part of the team that carried out the research,
said: "We keep looking for life, and we keep finding it, and it
keeps surprising us as to what it appears to be capable
of."
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-30489814
Methane
on the Red Planet is intriguing because here on Earth, 95% of the
gas comes from microbial organisms.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-30456664
BTW: atheists are being closed-minded. No, I'm not agnostic on human fantasies like fairies and Flying Spaghetti Monster, just question the possibilities of the origins of life, universe and everything.Why could 'dark matter' not have already existed before the 'big bang' and the universe spread into it?
###
Capitalism and Socialism
It is successful capitalism until it fails -
then it needs socialism to bail it out - proven with the
crash.
Capitalism is a corrupt system evolved out of
greed and power - not one that I would choose.
Many don't understand that trade isn't capitalism (or deliberately conflate both). Capitalism is the control of trade by corporate structures for rich greed.
BTW: For those that say Nazi's were socialists - Hitler fell out with Otto Strasser and his brother Gregor because they were socialists (read about it).
###
Job Creator Myth
The REALITY: does a factory get created with
jobs as a main reason - or is hundreds of jobs gone if it can be
done cheaper by machine?
Jobs are used only if necessity - 'job creators'
do not want an expense that has wages, holidays, sickness,
pensions, NI, can strike or have babies...
As
for the 'Wealth Creator' myth - guess who they create wealth for -
themselves - government applaud greed (for obvious
reasons).
I
am not saying we should be Luddites or that there is no economic
gain to having new factories - just not lie about the greed - why
they start business.
The customers are the ones that pay for these jobs, machinery and profits - it is a symbiotic relationship - they are more the 'job creators'.
###
New Labour & Socialism
Quote: He (Cameron) also accused Labour of betraying its traditional values and no longer representing working people.
Flip -
he really hit home with New Labour there - I'll give him a point
for that. New Labour are Tory Lite - another crime by
Blair.
I am a socialist - and we were right about having national services in the hands of the people - not greedy fat-cats whose fiduciary duty is to make as much profit as possible from us.
The rest of you are idiots to want privatisation and the sale of public housing that should be used for people who cannot afford to buy a home.
Sorry,
socialism isn't about selling houses - it is about helping people
live in homes - especially if they cannot afford to buy
one.
The public should not subsidise you making profits in private housing should they?
NB. If
"Labour... no longer representing working people" and (by that
statement) the Tories know they do not either, then who are
representing us?
Many
have a rose-tinted version of history with Tony Blair
- this
is even despite the fact he destroyed Labour. So much so that
Thatcher called New Labour her "greatest achievement" – and
still these foolish New Labour MP's do not get
it!
http://conservativehome.blogs.com/centreright/2008/04/making-history.html
A
lot is made of Blair bringing in the minimum wage - as it was
"a central plank of Tony Blair's 1997 election
manifesto".
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11896971
He
introduced it as he knew his mass immigration plan would drive down
wages - he was a clever and devious politician who knew what he was
doing.
Our firm paid much higher than minimum at first - then wages
migrated down and many of the 2,000 (99.9%) Brits there are
replaced by immigrants.
Even Tories understand minimum wage is a good neoliberal idea
so now fully support for propaganda purposes, calling themselves
the 'Workers Party'.
New Labour follow stupid capitalist neoliberal Tory policies like selling council housing - they cannot even see the simple fact that council housing should not be sold as it drives up housing benefits, rents and governments to make more cuts in benefit to those in need.
The
idea came realised by Thatcher's government - they not only hoped
to buy votes - but also yoke the workers like bosses used to with a
tied cottage and also remove cheap rented social housing for rich
landlords to exploit..
Also - you can sell it to pay for the old peoples home - instead of the government tax paying for it like they do for the rest of people in rental housing.
I will state yet again - privatisation was a fraud - selling to the public what they already owned. Do you want them to sell more property that you own - your car or home perhaps?
Police
have a duty to return stolen property without compensation - so you
can "magically undo a mistake on that scale" (somebody said you
couldn't).
The
Tories were right about the fact that New Labour helped ruin the
country – but they fail to say it is because they followed these
Tory policies and allowed the financial industry free reign to
defraud us.
###
Death Penalty
I am against the death penalty even for mass
murdering war crims like Blair and Bush - who killed more innocent
people than the vile 911 terrorist. It is most perverse and sick to
say 'murder is wrong and only terrible people murder' and then use
murder yourself.
###
The following subjects are work in progress:
All subjects to be expanded. Please forgive mix of fonts - see my skilled.org for a better example of poor website design (it was the old skilful.com site).
Are the Financial Authorities Corrupt?
Firstly - how do you know this is not a spurious claim by somebody of dubious intelligence?
Here is proof that our accusation of cover-up by financial regulators is valid. I won this official complaint against the ill-fated FSA for corrupt behaviour in defending Barclays against our claim they defrauded lots of their customers, including ourselves. Possibly a criminal act by FSA and definitely evasion of responsibilities as it actively aids and abets culpable/ criminal activity. Please do not be taken in - rebranding and changing their name to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) does not mean the dogma or the people are different. They perhaps believe that if there is no criminal prosecutions then that will help 'market confidence'. This is the main reason why the banks crashed and the finance industry are allowed to get away with with mass 'mis-selling' (fraud) to the public and why the financial industry can never be trusted. The financial authorities aid and abet corrupt firms with cover-up. There has to be prosecutions and jail so they know there is real personal danger in acting wrongfully, fines are ultimately paid by others.
This is ongoing (2013) with Barclays and the FOS both altering our customer complaint. The behaviour of the SFO was just as corrupt.
Justice delayed is justice denied.
If the financial regulators 'lack integrity' then what is the point of them exactly - and who else do you know that has proved this?
Head over to WoolwichSucks.co.uk to see what
Barclays, the Financial Services Authority (rebranded to the FCA),
Serious Fraud Office and Financial Ombudsman Service have been up
to. It is why we have big 'mis-selling' scams and the banking crash
- with their pretence of financial regulation.
You can make your own mind up from the documented evidence there. This involves recent activity by Barclays and the FOS (2013) - also it goes right to the top - not just the staff. It was admitted that Endowment Mortgages are "unfit for purpose" by Walter Merricks in 2001 (when head of the FOS). The financial authorities only warned us of this when loss was imminent - yet they must have known years before this. But they kept quiet - guess why.
They will certainly all deny that they acted
criminally. What they cannot deny with the evidence is the fact
they were evasive and tried to 'win' with attrition by refusing to
address the arguments that were put to them. Fact is different from
mere opinion, especially when shown in their own
communications.
Whilst authorities aid and abet by protecting the corrupt we will have more financial disasters. Remember what happened the last time we had a government- sponsored pensions revolution in the 1980's? What about the latest government- sponsored pensions revolution. The 'Workplace Pensions' - the "We're all in". All in what - is it the latest pension 'mis-selling' scandal? Given the financial industries record, do you have any idea?
Whilst on pensions. Regarding George Osborne
2014 pensions overhaul allowing people to cash in their
pension funds. One quote, "Chancellor insists pensioners
should be trusted with their finances". Insincere twonk - do you
honestly believe he thinks that. This stupid policy should be
reversed.
It is Tory madness. This is as bad as when they
sold council houses - a public asset to be used to home those on
low pay. Now we have private landlords making a fortune and housing
benefit we cannot afford. This will end in a financial
bloodbath - worse than any mis-selling (fraud) scam in the
past.
Supporters are:
1. Deliberate naive about millions of peoples ability to be able to
properly invest in adequate provision for their future.
2. Deliberate naive about the finance industry honesty - to not
'mis-sell' financial products/ services to pensioners
(defraud).
3. Deliberate naive about personal financial advisors selling
investments which reward the client best and not the
advisor.
Supporters want to make a better deal for
themselves so are willing to allow millions of old people to be
defrauded. Unfortunately that is considered a perfectly acceptable
Tory (selfish) viewpoint. How it is reasonable that people can be
sacrificed for financial gain of others I am at a loss to
understand.
Even so-called 'intelligent' people will be persuaded that they can do better, as with 'mis-selling' of endowment mortgages. I was one of them.
If the problem is annuities then tackle that.
Government should not abdicate their responsibility, chuck the
pension pots at people and say 'There, now bog off and get on with
it'. Government actually 'robbed' and ruined our pensions in 1997 -
up until then they were doing very well. They have a duty to put
things right and return the hundreds of billions 'stolen'.
Chancellor Gordon Brown knew the possible consequences. He was not
ignorant of the risks.
BTW: Do you know the difference between
mis-selling and fraud? Neither it seems do Barclays, FSA, SFO or
FOS - they were all asked many times. Ask yourself;
"Why it is not Fraud by false
representation
or
Fraud by failing to disclose
information or Fraud by abuse of
position? Why do the financial
authorities give corrupt firms large fines - which are then passed
onto you the customer or shareholder - instead of putting the
guilty people in jail?". Would jail not be even better than
personal fines (money come from you), which over the coming years
they will more than get back? See the Fraud
Act 2006.
Why do these people in authority not know jailing the guilty individuals is a bigger deterrent to 'mis-selling' (defrauding) the public?
In fact the Crown Prosecution Service say this:
8. Prosecution of a company should not be seen as a substitute for the prosecution of criminally culpable individuals such as directors, officers, employees, or shareholders. Prosecuting such individuals provides a strong deterrent against future corporate wrongdoing. Equally, when considering prosecuting individuals, it is important to consider the possible liability of the company where the criminal conduct is for corporate gain.
http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/a_to_c/corporate_prosecutions
On that specific
point - can somebody please remind me - I have looked everywhere
and cannot find the answer. With the banking collapse, why has
nobody been prosecuted? They knew they were gambling with customers
money. It was the same criminal reckless behaviour that 'rogue
traders' have been jailed for: Kweku Adoboli - Nick Leeson -
Matthew Taylor - or are the bankers being protected?
http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2012/nov/20/ubs-trader-kweku-adoboli-jailed-fraud
http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/december/2/newsid_2518000/2518423.stm
http://uk.reuters.com/article/2013/12/06/us-goldman-trader-sentencing-idUSBRE9B50XQ20131206
Bankers should be licenced with wages and bonuses capped - else no licence. It is a lie that they could not find anybody good to do the job for £250,000 (proposed maximum for fair wage legislation). Even paying millions is no guarantee they will be any good - as the recent disaster proved beyond doubt. It is a lie they need to pay millions to get the skill. Good riddance if they have insatiable greed and want more than anybody else in UK - they should go.
The deception
continues. Quote: RBS plan for 200% bonuses blocked by
Treasury body - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-27154184
This is not a massive great victory for the public - it is minor
propaganda by our corrupt government to pretend that the public are
being looked after.
These bankers are still overpaid and get massive bonuses - and even
Barclays bankers just got higher bonuses despite a 30% fall in
profits.
And worst of all - still nobody in UK has been held to account for
crimes that 'rogue traders' have been imprisoned for -
irresponsible gambling with other peoples money. Not one person has
spent a single day in jail for destroying the financial state of
our country. Government continue to protect them.
As further proof - of government helping criminals escapes:
Quote: A new
offence of aiding and abetting tax evasion and aggressive tax
avoidance is expected to be included in the budget next month,
George Osborne has said in his first comprehensive parliamentary
response to the HSBC scandal.
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/blog/live/2015/feb/23/jack-straw-and-malcolm-rifkind-respond-to-cash-for-access-allegations-politics-live-blog
There does not need a new law - we have one already, called aiding and abetting. This is a false excuse to let the guilty off. Government are complicit.
Quote: Assisting or Encouraging Crime
http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/h_to_k/inchoate_offences/
Taxation and why the 'fair' flat rate tax for everybody is a forthcoming con.
Government know that they punish the poorest and
middle income the most with taxation. They know that after the
bills are paid that you have little (if anything) left over. They
know that taxation is a greater burden on the poor working class,
what Cameron calls "hard working families" (to get you on side),
than on the rich.
Yes, it is you they squeeze until the pips
squeak, not the rich who whinge and say it is them getting
squeezed. Are the rich left with near nothing after they have paid
bills and tax? Please do not believe their deceptions or fall for
their spin e.g. the rich pay more of the UK tax bill
now than ever before.
You must have heard the propaganda (usually a Tory) saying, "the top 1% pay 30% of UK's (income) tax" - obviously meant to imply the rich pay loads more than their fair share. They seem to feel very sorry for this 'poor' 1% being picked on, perhaps themselves or their friends. Income tax is about a third of our taxes and they usually leaving out the part about it being income tax to imply they pay a third of the total tax bill to make them sound more picked upon. The top 1% get more than £160,000 and up to many millions - so do not cry too hard for them - you or I should be so hard done by.
Update: PMQ's Wednesday 29 October 2014. David Cameron stated, "...and the top 1% of taxpayers are paying 27% of all income tax—a higher percentage than ever happened under the last Labour Government". Please don't insult our intelligence - why do you have this contempt of us?
Pay the poor workers these massive rises
the CEO's get and the rest of us will pay much more tax also.
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201415/cmhansrd/cm141029/debtext/141029-0001.htm#14102956000005
As I say, the reason is most obvious, the
rich/poor gap is getting ever so much wider. Greedy fat-cats give
themselves massive wage rises - but not to the employees. Can you
really not see that this is very basic maths and purely
common-sense? Honestly - you do not understand simple
maths?
Clearly the starting rate of tax should be much
higher to lessen the burden on poorest, everybody benefits from
this, £15k at least. Minimum pay is crap.
A so-called 'fair' flat rate will simply mean that the rich will pay even less tax and therefore those on a lower wage will pay a bigger portion of the UK tax bill. It is a scam - any savings (e.g. administrative) help the rich not you. The government know most the 'legal' tax loopholes and can easily close them.
BTW: ISA's are used as an example of why
avoidance is legal. ISA's are not tax avoidance per se - the
government want you to take them out, indeed even advertise the
fact. Do government advertise other ways to avoid tax? They are a
tax incentive on saving after you paid income tax, totally
different - except to crooks. Both tax avoidance and evasion of
income tax should be a criminal offence.
This is not about envy but simply about fairness versus the deceiving of the public for rich and powerful peoples greed.
LIE: Inequality is at its lowest since 1986
There had been articles in the press and media
since the end of 2013 that the ONS had been saying we are now a
more equal society under Cameron. You did not need my good maths
skills to know this was a deception.
This was clearly a lie so I wrote to John Pullinger and Glen Watson (CEO and DG of the ONS):
Government LIE when they say, 'Inequality is at its lowest since 1986'. The fact of the matter is that the gap between richest and poorest gets wider every year. You know the truth - the fat-cats have removed their wage differentials and have been giving themselves up to 20-30% wage rise year on year whilst giving workers a couple of percent (if they are lucky and not had a wage cut). Even in a really bad year they gave themselves 14%.
Quote: Directors' pay jumps 14% in year thanks
to share incentives. Incomes Data Services (IDS) said this took the
average pay for a director of a FTSE 100 firm to £3.3m.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-24983178
Google yourself and see headlines like: 2012
FTSE 100 directors enjoy 27pc pay rises. What pay rise did you get
in the recession? Bet not 27%.
Government, ONS and greedy bosses lie when they
say we are getting more equal - tell them the truth - that they are
all liars. Politicians cannot use the word in Parliament - so if
anybody tells you that inequality has come down - just look them in
the eye and point at them. They will know what it
means.
Quote Sunday 21 July 1996 - gap is wider now:
Britain is now the most unequal country
in the Western world, an authoritative new United
Nations report reveals. The gap between rich and poor is as great
as in Nigeria.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk-most-unequal-country-in-the-west-1329614.html
Why we need Fair
Wage legislation.
It is obvious to get the fairest society with nobody getting several hundreds times the annual wage of their workers - that is just sickening greed.
Though it is only right that there should be
wage differentials between jobs - being paid more for greater
responsibilities and skills.
However the top bosses have decided to remove
their differentials - rising their wages by many times year on year
- whilst holding yours down,
I am only talking of introducing fair wage legislation - not wealth sharing - just more equal wage structure - there will be no increase in the total wage bill.
I personally believe a boss should not receive more than ten times that of any employee - about right for a rich/poor gap.
With the rich/poor gap actually getting ever
wider - it is clearly no longer just greed - it is avarice -
insatiable greed.
Indeed - it was always known that a wide rich/poor gap was wrong - this legislation has been advocated before by a famous greek philosopher.
Plato (427-347 B.C.): "Any city, however small,
is in fact divided into two, one the city of the poor, the other of
the rich; these are at war with one another." (The
Republic)
Also, "The form of law which I propose would be
as follows: In a state which is desirous of being saved from the
greatest of all plagues -- not faction, but rather distraction --
there should exist among the citizens neither extreme poverty nor,
again, excessive wealth, for both are productive of great evil . .
.
Now the legislator should determine what
is to be the limit of poverty or of
wealth."
Quote from news article: Just what is fair pay?
Plato said the income of the highest paid in society should never
amount to more than five times that of the lowest
paid.
Plato was right – there is an implicit agreement
in society that the rich cannot simply exploit their power
to unreasonably enrich themselves.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/jun/03/public-sector-pay-cameron-executive-bonuses.
IMNSHO: Legislation should cut top pay to £250,000 and then give them half inflation rate rises yearly. Those below should get rises in line with inflation. This then should continue until the ratio of 10 to one is reached between top and bottom.
BTW: Socrates believed that injustice was more than doing wrong - it was not doing right.
###
NHS with PFI = Public Financing Immorality
(greed of those that profit millions from NHS
spending)
Get it into your thick skull - PFI is NOT saving money - it clearly costs us more. Buying a hospital works out cheaper than renting it - from rich landlords.
Also cost saving with DNR or killing with Liverpool Care Pathway - what for? To spend money on political projects e.g. financial support for other countries.
Quote: David Cameron warned NHS in danger of collapse within five years.
http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/jun/28/cameron-warned-nhs-in-danger-of-collapse
Strange, many of these reports do not give the main reason - not an aging population that cannot be avoided - but greedy rich people actually profiting from it. The government are quiet about the cause - because they are to blame.
Yes - PFI - rich people taking millions from our taxes. They ripped us off by privatising everything else - there was only privatising finance left. At least one commentator had it sussed two years ago - though many of us knew decades ago.
BTW:
Hospitals should not be paying any 'rent' - is this not obvious.
They should be bought and paid for by government.
Quote: How PFI is crippling the NHS.
We can still afford to pay for universal healthcare – but only if we stop using NHS funds to prop up banks and equity investors
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/jun/29/pfi-crippling-nhs
Quote: Buildings in Devon funded by private finance initiatives (PFI) will cost nearly five times more than if just government funded, the BBC understands. Government figures show the PFI cost of buildings such as schools, hospitals armed forces' accommodation and other major projects will be nearly £2.4bn.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-devon-22355993
Quote:The 717 PFI contracts currently under way across the UK are funding new schools, hospitals and other public facilities with a total capital value of £54.7bn, but the overall ultimate cost will reach £301bn by the time they have been paid off over the coming decades.
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2012/jul/05/pfi-cost-300bn
Why are people in denial about the facts? That £301bn was in 2012 - the case will be MUCH worse now.
Certain people are getting very rich off our NHS spending. What risk for them - when have they lost money? It is money for nothing - PFI is a rip-off. Wake up folks - we are being squeezed dry by corrupt people for the gain of others more wealthy than us.
One last point - what sort of people would want the NHS privatised - for extremely greedy fat-cats to profit to from our taxes?
###
Quote: “I sometimes get asked: why do I believe in tax cuts so much? It’s simple, because I trust people more than I do politicians,” he will say.
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/jan/26/david-cameron-tax-cuts-reward-for-sacrifice
He went on to say, "This is because we are all a bunch of liars - especially me and the Tory party" - obviously a joke - he would not admit that.
There is certainly no arguing with the last part - but unfortunately we need tax to pay for essentials - which the Tories want us all to pay for privately - so the poorest suffer even more and their rich friends get even richer.
They use a undeniable truth to sell their lies and deception to us - this is the most basic tool of propagandists.
David Cameron justifies tax cuts for the rich as rewarding aspiration.
There
is 'aspirational' and then there is Tory greed and avarice - for
bankers, fat-cats and their like.
###
Mass Immigration
This is NOT about racism or xenophobia as some disgusting people try to pretend it is about. Many of us would do the same given the chance to go to a country with four times the wages and a better life style. This is about protecting the future of our country for the sake of our children and grandchildren.
Even without mass immigration, we have to get better food/ water/ energy security - this will mean looking at desalination plants or massive pipelines from Scotland - also possible safer nuclear energy (thorium?) - increasing field usage for food crops and farms... When some unexpected disaster strikes (e.g. world grain shortage through wheat blight), we know politicians will say, "How were we to know THIS disaster would happen - how could we plan for it?".
Think about it for a minute - what do millions of extra people do to food/ water/ energy security? It absolutely destroys it you self-retards.
The media are perpetrators of others propaganda. Those that want cheap labour and to keep your wages held down. There are also those who cannot see the bigger picture and those which want more people from their own country to come join them of course.
Firstly - the net financial gain is a lie - even if it is only a 'mars bar'. It does not include all costs e.g. Crime - immigrant gang credit card fraud and other crimes. Only idiots believe government figures about this. Hello to these fools - guess why government fiddle them. It is a scam anyway - as parents what would you pay to prevent your daughter being raped or son killed? This is the insurmountable human cost that nobody will talk or think about - or is willing for the victims and their parents to pay this price for their poor judgement - foolishly thinking it will never happen to them.
Any transitional controls are merely delay or a disincentive at best and is certainly not controlling long term immigration levels.
I will shout this for all the multiculturlist self-retards - MASS IMMIGRATION MAKES ALL PROBLEMS MUCH WORSE
Every crime or murder by immigrant could be avoided, if your daughter was raped or son stabbed by immigrant - it wouldn't have happened.
It is a lie that immigration does not affect the crime rate - e.g. different cultures are going to increase the murder rate:
Jamaicans up to 40 times (447 /million), Iraqis by 8 times (101 /million) and Pakistanis by 3 times (38 /million)
The English now having a murder rate of 12 murders per million - in 1970 it was 7 per million - why has it gone up?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rate
ONS Homicide report 2017:
Historically, the number of homicides increased from around 300 per year in the early 1960s to over 800 per year in the early years of this century, which was at a faster rate than population growth over the same period.
The government KNOW that it will cost more per person in health care e.g. "Thousands of south Asian people with dementia are being failed by outdated health and care services designed for white British patients, according to an alarming review that warns the UK is “woefully unprepared” to cope with a predicted sevenfold increase in cases."
"People of south Asian heritage in the UK are more likely to develop the disease than the general population due to their higher risk of other illnesses, such as heart disease, stroke and diabetes, that increase the risk of dementia. The number of them living with dementia is set to increase by 600% within the next three decades."
This increase in making problems starts before a child is even born - if is a problem that is countrywide. The deaths in childbirth is shown as an example of racism in the NHS - when certain groups are more prone to health problems. Ignored by pathetic cowards with head in sand who think it racist to point out.
Quote: 'Silence must end' - call for action on baby deaths of 'related' couples
Prominent campaigner Nazir Afzal today urged community leaders in Birmingham to act with urgency over the number of babies who die or are disabled by congenital disorders as a result of being born to cousins.
There could even be a case for outlawing marriage between close relations to end the misery being suffered by these 'profoundly affected children and parents', he said.
https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/silence-must-end-call-action-20348860
I must have heard nearly all the so-called reasons for this from pro-immigration supporters. Unless you can come up with something new you will lose this argument e.g. 'we wouldn't have a NHS were it not for immigration'. We could have had managed immigration for doctors and nurses - though we should have better training in the UK and be supplying our own, not simply taking away doctors and nurses from poorer countries. Education and training has got abysmal over decades - it can be fixed. Another of favourite argument from these blinkered people is, 'we need lots of immigration to pay for our growing elderly'. Err - as far as the UK is concerned, this is our biggest influx ever - how many more are needed on top of current immigration - 500,000 net? Also - don't the immigrants themselves ever get old, don't they have children and grandchildren who also get old, this is a massive pyramid scam.
BTW:80,000 UK students are told they can't train as a nurse - despite recruiting almost 6,000 overseas nurses (2013: 4 out of 5). It costs the NHS £70,000 to train a nurse for three years – the same amount it costs for 3 qualified foreign nurses. Our politicians and authorities are clearly corrupt to deny our youngsters this work and to give it to people in other countries. It is a propaganda lie to say we cannot get enough British nurses - they do not want to train them. The requirement for a degree now does not help. The Blair legacy does not help either - our country did not need 50% of workers to get a university qualification for a job. This was to give them hope, which they knew was false for many - and that they would end up in debt of course.
The
bosses do not train any more to anything like they used to. In
early 1970's, I was trained by EITB (Engineering Industry Training
Board) as a Mechanical Engineering Technician Trainee - and later
as a Telecommunications Technician Trainee with PYE
Telecom.
1964 -
Engineering Industry Training Board
The EITB had the power to impose a financial training levy on
employers over a certain size. Employers who could prove a good
track record of training activity could be granted exemption from
most of the levy..
Corrupt governments would rather give skilled jobs to foreign workers than train our British kids up to higher standards.
Quote: The government's plan will see an expansion in [doctor] training places from 6,000 to 7,500 a year.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-37546360
Quote: Number of foreign nurses coming to UK doubled in three years
as NHS poaches workers from abroad
I have
wrote something like the following at least 100 times:
We need a moratorium - close the doors to all immigration (except essential) until an open objective analysis is done. This should be about where we are and where we want to be on UK population. This should take into account all factors - not just the usual focus by the dumbing down media e.g. jobs and housing or that touched on like crime. Though they misrepresent this and say it has brought down crime - they try deceive you and talk about per capita. In actual fact the numbers of crimes have soared - more murders, rape, child molestation, theft, burglary, card fraud, et cetera... The police and authorities actively covered up the grooming rape gangs - racist rape of thousands of young white girls by those born of Pakistani immigrants. Here in Haverhill a local man had his head smashed in with a claw hammer by an immigrant. You would have to be self-retarded woke/ multiculturalist to ignore facts like this.
Incidentaly - on grooming gangs - we get self-retarded woke playing down immigrant crimes and ignore the racist aspect when it is 'Pakistani gangs' of men raping thousands young white girls.
Quote: "A new Home Office report admits grooming gangs are not a ‘Muslim problem'
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/dec/19/home-office-report-grooming-gangs-not-muslim
Perhaps Ella Cockbain and Waqas Tufail will point out all the white grooming gangs that have targeted and raped young Muslim girls or young Black/ Chinese/??? girls.
However, the analysis should also examine serious things which so far have been ignored - like food, water and energy security. Also things that negatively affect our way of life, such as increased NHS usage and road congestion. Whatever corrupt party are in government they will 'solve' the congestion problem by getting you off the road with 'road pricing' - spinning it as a 'green tax'. No 'road to riches' with our government - it will be 'roads for the rich'.
Though
I doubt the authorities will have an open public Inquiry - because
of the obvious outcome. Of course not pre-judging the result, but
you do not need qualifications in immigration to see it is making
things worse. Though these may be the wrong 'experts' to ask, as it
seems they have a massive blind spot and are
even afraid to answer a simple question about
"displacement". Are they really that
frightened to answer? Anyhow, it is like we are all on a big
bus heading for the edge of a cliff, a bus full of blind people -
with a foot hard on the accelerator.
We need the moratorium because you don't try fix a sinking Titanic whilst smashing more holes below the waterline - immigration makes all problems much worse. We should have had points based system two decades ago - from the EU also. We likely need to let in less than the number emigrating.
We cannot save the world from a population explosion (without spraying countries with Nestorone or some other contraceptive drug - which I do not advocate) - but we may be able to save the UK. That is if it is not too late.
Some do advocate it though: SAN FRANCISCO, Nov. 24-1969-A possibility that the Government might have to put sterility drugs in reservoirs and in food shipped to foreign countries to limit human multiplication was envisioned today by a leading crusader on the population problem.
https://www.nytimes.com/1969/11/25/archives/a-sterility-drug-in-food-is-hinted-biologist-stresses-need-to-curb.html
I have also said many times - the figures are all BS anyway. We are being swamped, the authorities and MPs lie to us about it, those that are corrupt - not just simply incompetent to protect their voters and constituents e.g. from increased competition for jobs and housing.
How can you trust the ONS when they admit they undercount the number of immigrants. What makes it worse is MPs have known they falsify figures for years - to help against dissent of mass immigration - like positive multiculturalism policy. The odds that the ONS underestimate should be 50/50 - if it was unbiased and not deliberately flawed towards giving one result. Give just one year when the ONS overestimated the number of immigrants - you cannot.
Quote: Immigration numbers 'far higher' - A new report claims UK immigration figures are not accurate
The number of immigrants entering the UK is far higher than government figures show, a new report suggests.
Economic consultancy Capital Economics claims that net immigration in 2005 was actually 400,000, rather than the official figure of 185,000.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6234011.stm
Quote: The Office for National Statistics said it was reviewing the quality of data but could not alter the past estimates.
It has already accepted it undercounted the number of immigrants from countries which joined the EU after 2004.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-23265391
2013 is
likely BS also, said to be 212,00 net (532,000 in 320,000 out).
However, "National Insurance numbers given to foreigners - an
important indicator of immigration levels - showed a 19% rise to
617,000 in 2013",
TheCourier. 617,000 -
532,000 = 85,000 more, therefore the figure is nearer 297,000. In
fact it is very likely to be much higher as this is only those that
have registered for National Insurance. NI is issued for 16th
birthday - which means that many of those coming will not get a NI
number for their children. The number of NI numbers and immigrants
should tally over time - they do not.
Quote:
The net flow of migrants into the UK over a 10-year period was
underestimated by nearly 350,000, the Office for National
Statistics says.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-26972597
Shock -
not. This will also be a gross underestimation.
Politicians know that mass immigration is making our problems much worse. They know they are making it harder for their constituents to get a job and a home. Yes - our 'honourable' politicians deliberately ruin the future for our children by taking away their jobs and homes.
Government
use financial benefit to us as the reason. This 4p per week benefit
(3 Jan 2007) to us is best case case scenario (using government
fiddled figures) and does not include all non-attributable costs.
Immigrants are generally with the lower paid requiring benefits to
top up wages. Governments want cheap labour immigration primarily
to keep workers wages down.
We have to get out of EU if we want control of our borders. The EU is a scam anyway, they allow non-compatible countries to join e.g. having a quarter of our minimum pay - of course they are going to flood over here. We are not going to flood Poland with our workers. Many would though to a country with a wage four times ours - individual immigrants themselves are not to blame - it is our government who want cheap labour to hold wages down. We should have what we voted for - a common market with no export /import duties.
The reason this has been allowed to continue is because the censorship of debate - to allow supporters of immigration (inc. government) their way.
People have said that leaving EU to control our borders would lose us jobs. They pretend we could not have a mutually beneficial trade agreement with no import or export duties between us and the EU. Even taking what they say as true - had we not allowed millions immigrants to take 'our' jobs then we would have many times more jobs available than we would lose. Did we get 212,000 (297,000) more jobs from EU in 2013 for taking these immigrants in?
As for idiots who say things like,
"Multiculturalism isn't an ideology, it's a fact of life":
Multiculturalism
is a policy, being positive about other cultures without proper
scrutiny e.g. sending those making reports about
child-molesting
criminals in
Rotherhamon 'diversity' courses because of the race
of criminals, instead of prosecuting these vile criminals. Those
like you are the reason problems persist.
We have
an (inflated) multicultural society - which is different from
multiculturalism
policy.
Is this
really so hard for you idiotic fools to understand?
Multiculturalism is not simply a description - it is propaganda policy brought in by a corrupt New Labour party to aid mass immigration and to lie that it is positive. It allowed Female Genital Mutilation to continue - despite supposedly being illegal nobody was prosecuted. It allowed young girls to be forced into marriage. It allows the public to be fed Halal meat - a backward step of bringing religion back into our food.
This is what your multiculturalism and 'diversity' has brought us - not only has the UK become a backward country that allows FGM - but this:
Quote: Library books which urge women to be submissive to their husbands and never refuse sex are among a dossier of misogynistic material inspectors have found in Islamic schools. Ofsted has compiled a file of the worst examples of discrimination and sexism its inspectors encountered. The material includes excerpts from library books and children’s marked work which sanction domestic violence. Among the worst examples was a book discovered in a school library entitled, “Women who deserve to go to hell” which said that it was wrong for wives to show “ingratitude to their husband” or “have tall ambitions”.
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/it-s-ok-to-beat-your-wife-says-islamic-school-book-vll3jdjw7
Continuing with Islam - this religion contains a whole range of people in the UK - many even admitting support of Islamic beliefs like women being second class.
Islam is obviously to me not compatible with being British - these are things believers are not afraid admitting to (but likely more who agree - like the Brexit polls).
BTW: Just (2023) found out in 2005 Tony Blair changed the law so that Muslims do not pay stamp duty (5% to 12%) if "you use alternative property financial arrangements, for example to comply with Sharia law"- https://www.gov.uk/stamp-duty-land-tax/reliefs-and-exemptions
Quote: What British Muslims Really Think
52% Muslims do not believe that homosexuality should be legal in Britain
47% Muslims do not believe that it is acceptable for a school teacher to be homosexual
39% Muslims agree that “wives should always obey their husbands”.
32% Muslims refuse to condemn those who take part in violence against those who mock the Prophet
31% Muslims think it's acceptable for a man to have more than one wife
23% Muslims support the introduction of Sharia Law.
21% Muslims refuse to completely condemn those people who take part in stoning those who commit adultery.
https://www.channel4.com/press/news/c4-survey-and-documentary-reveals-what-british-muslims-really-think
Undercover Mosque: The Return
A female reporter attends prayer meetings at an important British mosque which claims to be dedicated to moderation and dialogue with other faiths. She secretly films shocking sermons given to the women-only congregation in which female preachers recite extremist and intolerant beliefs. As hundreds of women and some children come to pray, a preacher calls for adulterers, homosexuals, women who act like men and Muslim converts to other faiths to be killed, saying: "Kill him, kill him. You have to kill him, you understand. This is Islam."
Worshippers are repeatedly told they must lead separate lives from non-believers and not tolerate other religions. Christian teachings are described as "vile and disgusting, an abomination."
http://www.channel4.com/news/articles/dispatches/undercover+mosque+the+return/2436087.html
With this religion is there any surprise we have Muslims like Khairi Saadallah (Reading park), Usman Khan (London Bridge) and Salman Abedi (Manchester Arena)?
We are extremely tolerant of Islam e.g. serving our British kids Halal meat in schools (google images how animals are killed).
Yet Christian bakers are forced by a judge to write 'Support Gay Marriage' on a cake and told that it is refusing to serve gay people - this is religious tolerance?
Actually - the first phase of wokeness was multiculturalism - virtue signalling you are better than all other people who you say are racist or transphobic or anti-gay or...
Multiculturalism
cancer by skilful.com
What highlights THE sickness - multiculturalism cancer - is stage 3 - the stage they are unable to care for the damage done to British working families.
Stage 1 - afraid to criticise other religions and backward cultures e.g. Islam or Pakistan (try living there).
Stage 2 - tell other people they 'ought not to be doing that' when they criticise.
Stage 3 - convince yourself it is for the greater good - virtue signal at every opportunity - you are clearly better than them.
Stage 4 - make the lives of critics hell - at least get them sent on diversity courses as a 'racist' or try get them sacked.
When you reach stage 3 it is a terminal disease and you will die with it - nothing can save you as there is no cure.
As to asylum seekers and refugees - we should have very few. When they are in France or other EU countries they are NOT fleeing violence, war and persecution - they are safe and not a refugee - they are financial immigrants.
Indeed, not a single one of these illegals supporters has explained why, if they were desperately seeking asylum, they did not do so in France - or how they were so in fear for their life in France that they had to seek it in the UK.
But more telling of this terrible fraudulant lie on the British public is the fact that the past we know that most were women, children and old men - most the current assortment are young men - many trying to pass off as children...
Quote: More Europe migrants to gain
access to full UK benefits
Migrants from the eight countries which joined the EU in 2004 will
be able to claim full benefits in the UK for the first time from
May (2011).
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-12633382
Quote: The extortionate cost of housing (illegal word left out) migrants
The Home Office has had to find an extra £2 billion to fund hotel accommodation
Labour’s answer to the migration crisis is to call for the asylum process to be accelerated.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/2023/03/09/extortionate-cost-housing-migrants/
Labour are correct - I advocate the process is thus and a bill passed in Parliament:
1. On landing, escort all those arriving via boat back to France - as French authorities escorted them here.
2. Those illegals arriving by other means e.g. lorry - returned to the last safe country of the lorries departure.
3. Review all those making legal and lawful representation. Ask them to explain why, if they were desperately seeking asylum, they did not do so in the last country they were in - and how they were so in fear for their life in that country that they had to seek it in the UK. Return if no satisfactory answer. This would include those overstayers - only if their country was in danger (e.g. at war at the time of return) and those applying from unsafe countries.
4. Accept those who are real refugees and not criminals or a danger to British people in any way (political or religious views) - refuse those that are a risk.
5. ALL those in the past who came here illegally and claimed asylum from EU got a pecuniary advantage by deception - so should be retuned to the EU.
Here is another exchange on a forum about Islam and multiculturalism:
Whyayeman wrote: Skilfuldotcom, how confused you sound, old thing!
Islamism (as opposed to Islam) is violently opposed to multiculturalism. They, like you, are intolerant of difference.
And, just to be finished with this, Islam is practised in many different cultures without friction or unease. It is you who has the problem.
skilful.com wrote: Whyayeman, how confused you ARE, poor child!
Khairi Saadallah was motivated by his religion to kill these innocent victims - a religion supported by multiculturalism.
However - as you are still at school I will address your points to teach you a few things:
Islam is violently opposed to other *cultures* - as can be seen in Islamic countries - are intolerant of difference (try living in Pakistan if you don't believe me).
Multiculturalism is different - a sickness when you are being positive about other cultures and accusing those criticising other cultures of being racist.
And, just to be finished with this, Islam is practised in many different cultures without friction or unease - but we do not know how they treat wives/ daughters.
EDIT: Islam treats women as being half worth of a man and Iranian women need certificates to prove they are virgins" https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-62423983.
It is you who has the problem - multiculturalism cancer (I hope it has not reached stage 3) - likely from your parents.
====================================
In the
Guardian 6/3/2014 is
the story: Report reveals little evidence foreign migrants
put British workers out of jobs - Because if immigrants
did not come here to take British jobs then the work would do
itself presumably. Are people really that dense they believe this
tripe? Honestly?
A supporter of mass immigration posted to me saying that we need immigrants because "Migrants are predominantly young, single and well motivated - exactly the type of workers whose productivity is high". Yet, do we not have our own - one million unemployed British youngsters, "young, single and well motivated - exactly the type of workers whose productivity is high"?
Your sons, daughters and grandchildren - many of whom have been deceived into thinking that paying thousands for extra education would get them good jobs. You supporters of mass immigration want to stick our youngsters on the scrapheap and replace them with foreign workers. Are you all proud of yourselves - you should be disgusted. Everybody else can see you are wrong - what is the matter with you?
BTW: The main parties are entirely responsible for the rise of UKIP. If they had took reasonable measures and controlled immigration the problems would not be as bad now. Only idiots believe both the main parties 'tough act' e.g. Cameron knew his "Tens of thousands" pledge was a lie - impossible to keep.
Additional: Many are silly about "only tens of thousands" - there will be hundreds of thousands new people coming into the UK to make figure - potential criminals that need scrutiny. Hundreds of thousands will leave e.g. year ending June 2021: 573,000 people came and 334,000 left = 239,000 net.
https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/sn06077/
Quote: It suggests "displacement" - the number of UK workers unemployed as a consequence of immigration - is well below the figure used by ministers of 23 for every 100 additional immigrants. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-26435000
This latest propaganda is the stupid idea that immigrants do little to put British workers out of a job, "displacement". If the immigrants did not come then guess who else would get the jobs. Yes - British workers. Do not believe the lies. My wife has done the cleaning jobs that British workers are supposed not to want - we both have done low paid factory jobs that we Brits are told we do not want. Millions of us have. Millions are unemployed and want a job or to come off part-time hours (or zero hour contracts) onto full-time. With zero hours we are back to the dark ages, when workers stood at the factory gate, waiting to see if the well-fed fat boss would pick them. Saying, "I'll have you, you and you - the rest come back tomorrow". Work hardest and don't upset him or he'll not ask you back again.
Think about what they say. We have family & friends that work looking after the elderly. What jobs will we Brits not do - that only foreigners will?
To prove the emperor wears no clothes I tweeted migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk. They would not answer the simple question - who else would get the jobs if immigrants did not come. This is clearly because the story that 'immigrants only take a few jobs away from British workers' is complete BS.
These are supposed to be learned people, experts on the subject, academics. They treat us like imbeciles - when they are the ones who are idiots, if they think we would all fall for such a pile of intellectual tripe. They and politicians need a kick up the
BTW: This underestimation still continues by a corrupt ONS - it will always do so.
Quote August 2019: EU migration to UK 'underestimated' by ONS
@CVar_Sil
@xtophercook
@MigObs suggests "displacement" is below that claimed.
False, who else would get the jobs if immigrants did not come.
— Garry Anderson (@skilfuldotcom) March 4, 2014
Food Security
Somebody wrote: ...so, linking immigration to 'Food
Security' you think, Mad[World], that if immigration is curbed or
stopped, the UK will somehow be exempt from any future catastrophic
effects, say this wheat bug thing, on the global food
supply. ...what
was that about low intelligence?
Reply: Oh dear, you are aware that since we had Blair we have had net immigration of 200,000 plus, using ONS fiddled figures always underestimating.
If we
managed immigration we could have had net loss of 200,000 every
year and still had upto 100,000+ essential immigrants come in every
year.
Indeed
in 2013 was said to be 212,00 net (532,000 in 320,000 out), we
could have let 100,000 in and been 220,000 net
loss.
That
would ALLEVIATE problems with UK food security.
"...what
was that about low intelligence?"
You are
not of low intelligence - though you give this appearance - I never
said or implied we will "be exempt from any future catastrophic
effects" - did I?
This is
about preparing for future catastrophic events, which are bound to
happen, be it a world crisis in our crops with drought or disease
or whatever.
BTW: I do not advocate any fascist-type population control - indeed I say so on my website: We cannot save the world from a population explosion (without spraying countries with Nestorone or some other contraceptive drug - which I do not advocate), but we may be able to save the UK. That is if, not too late.
HERE is a tweet that nobody can answer when arguing about mass immigration:
How am
I wrong - how are problems not worse.
Just *human cost* of immigrant crime: how much would you pay to
stop your son killed or daughter raped?
Would you praise immigration then - I do not think so.
What about taking better paid skilled jobs at their work that they
could do?
I had a reply ready (as I usually do to tweets) - should they simply say it is 'only a possiblity of crime' or similar.
Then you are making the decision for all those whose sons are killed and daughters who are raped by an immigrant - including second generation crimes like those in young girls raped by grooming gangs in Rotherham and across the country, how arrogant of you. What about jobs taken?
Fora
posts and misc to be sorted:
I sometimes use the pseudonym of MadWorld on forums (because it is). Most the press and TV help spread propaganda - they are not the media but the 'madia'. For example, maps on BBC etc. of Israel/ Palestine conflict show them a more equal size - when Israel actually occupy most of it. The word "anti-semitism" is misused by evil people to mean anti-Jew or anti-Israel - because Arabs are also Semites. And not all Jews are Zionists. So, to start.
In a
recent August 2022 post vinnydell wrote:
You two are judging an entire country based on their government. Criticism of their government, fine criticise it all you like, but leave the nation alone.
They're a democratic country with far more human
rights than any other country in the region and better human rights
than Russia has under that f<expletive> Nazi
C<expletive> Putin.
My reply ignoring his diversionary tactic:
Not quite right
Vinny.
It is like somebody stole your car and GAVE it to
a bloke who knew it was YOUR CAR - that bloke is the nation of
people.
Actually much worse than that - this somebody
stole your house and land for that bloke.
You are intelligent enough to understand this and
yet you still protect the bloke who effectively robbed all their
property - why is that then?
PALESTINE
Anti-Zionism is not anti-Semitism (anti-Jew), those that say it is prove themselves to be the most vile of people, to slur the innocent with such terrible lies.
The maps above show how Palestinians are wiping Israel off the map - for those idiots who believe the propaganda - the reverse is true. Yep, Israel is guilty of committing the actual crime they accuse Hamas of wanting to commit. Israel are the land-thieving aggressors. The murder and violence is a lot worse coming from the Israeli side. Palestinians killed a few people with thousands of their rockets, Israelis killed thousands witha few of their missiles. Is this response proportional?
http://www.worldcitizen.uk.net/palestine.htm
Quote:
United Nations Security Council resolution 446, adopted on 22 March
1979, concerned the issue of Israeli settlements in the "Arab
territories occupied by Israel since 1967, including Jerusalem".[1]
This refers to the Palestinian territories of the West Bank, East
Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip as well as the Syrian Golan
Heights.
In the Resolution, the Security Council determined: "that the
policy and practices of Israel in establishing settlements in the
Palestinian and other Arab territories occupied since 1967 have no
legal validity and constitute a serious obstruction to achieving a
comprehensive, just and lasting peace in the Middle East"
The Resolution was adopted by 12 votes to none, with 3 abstentions
from Norway, the United Kingdom and the United States of
America.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Council_Resolution_446
We are the biggest supporters of America and Israel - America
allowing the murder and abuse of the Palestine people by Israel -
doing nothing to stop it - indeed we both supply the arms for
Israel to kill them.
We and America supply bombs to Israel and bandages to Palestine. We
both give real support to the aggressors and just pity to the
victims.
Quote:UK government reviewing £8bn of arms sales to Israel - 4 August 2014.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/aug/04/uk-government-reviews-arms-sales-israel-gaza
It is called 'collective punishment' - it is a violation of the laws of war and the Geneva Conventions. Indeed, Israel uses German World War 2 policy of Sippenhaftung and make innocent families pay for crimes of others. Also even directly targeting the homes of Hamas, killing their wives and children.
If this was any other country other than Israel doing this then our government would condemn their government as criminals.
With
exception of America (who can do no wrong in eyes of UK government)
of course - they can unlawfully invade countries and we will help
them in a mass killing of civilians and soldiers defending their
country from illegal invaders.
This is why we are a target - we give weapons to kill innocent men,
women, children and babies - our government ministers are murderous
evil b's.
Talking
about targeting - the excuse used by Israel that they do not target
civilians. For some strange reason, using twisted logic, they think
firing a missile on a house is not deliberate murder. Obviously,
they use this line for political motive. They target ALL people in
the house - they do not want any to escape in case it is the Hamas
member they want to kill - true or false? The wife and children are
also targeted - this is why it is collective punishment. Nobody is
saying the Israeli government wish the wife and children were
killed - not least for bad publicity - but all are
targets.
Some say it is a border dispute - but that is where the complainant says, 'the border should be here' and the other says 'no there'. What we have here is one side saying we want our border here - then later saying we want it here to take more land - then later saying we want it here to take more land...
Only to
a simple minded person is it a 'border dispute' - there are
millions of them about. What it is, in fact, is the grabbing more
and more land. Sicko's try pretend this is just about anti-Semitism
or anti-Jewish agenda (to protect an evil state government). This
is just criticism of support for land theft.
The
BBC are biased, even refusing to air a national charity appeal -
quote; The BBC was in crisis last night as politicians including
government ministers, religious leaders and senior members of its
own staff condemned the decision not to broadcast a charity appeal
to help the stricken people of Gaza rebuild their homes.
http://www.theguardian.com/media/2009/jan/24/bbc-gaza-palestine-aid-appeal
Everybody knows that Israel want to keep all the land they stole - to profit from crime by attrition and time - even those that defend Israel. Israel was born with terrorist attacks from 1944 onward. They murdered British, American and Arabs. There was also terrible ethnic cleansing - the destruction of more than 400 villages, 11 towns and the expulsion of 750,000 Palestinian Arabs. Do not let anybody pretend anything different.
Certainly nobody denies there was evil done to the Jews by Germans - but there is no excuse to do evil to others. Is there?
Zionists call people that support Palestine 'anti-Semite' - when Palestinians are Semites. They are also call them 'anti-Jew' - which is another sick slur. This shows their nature - when all that these people want is for the aggressive land theft and aggression to stop - so peace process can begin. A cease-fire allows Israel to continue stealing land - it should also include a clause to return stolen land.
The Zionists could have had all the compassion in the world - instead they act in a way that makes them hated by Arabs. I personally believe that the best solution (after a single state Palisrael?) would be a return to 1947 UN borders - a victory for both sides.
Additional: It is not just Israeli government. August 2014; Most people of Israel support a disproportional response from government despite there being only one Israeli Arab killed in a field by thousands of Hamas rockets, the hundreds of people killed in Gaza by Israeli missiles was still was not enough.
Quote: There is no geopolitical issue more bitterly divisive than Israel and Palestine at the best of times...
My response: Actually, there is no geopolitical issue more wrong than Israel and Palestine - all of the time.
A demonstrably true fact, look at how the media portray the region - shown above - the maps show Israel and Palestine at roughly the same size. The fact of the matter is that Israel occupy most of it - they commit the crime they accuse Hamas of - they wipe Palestine off the map. There is much more - but there are people so polarised they cannot even see the disproportionality - it will fall on deaf ears or, more accurately, on closed eyes.
I would link to terrible pictures of Gaza suffering with dismembered bodies and adults or babies with limbs blown off - but this post would be deleted.
Look at the disproportionate response to Israel deaths - Palestine is fighting for survival - Israel is fighting for expansion.
#
This is
the sort of blinkered posts I get.
interested wrote: I give up Skilful[dotcom] I suppose I can't
expect mere facts to sway your opinion! Just carry on
repeating the propaganda....you might start believing it
eventually.
It is you who is repeating the Zionist propaganda - whose land was
it before we helped steal it for Zionists?
You ignore the overriding fact - that the Palestinians are the
victims - their land was stolen from them - we took part in that
crime.
You cannot beat this overriding fact - objectively it is paramount
and beats all others into insignificance.
You steal somebodies property - who does it truthfully belong to -
you or them?
Link
removed
tinculin wrote: Individual Palestinians do not have national borders - a fact you can’t deny.
Is it just me that thinks he's living in a world of
self-retards?
That intelligent 'people' really think Palestine is like
early America hundreds of year ago?
That they can kill and throw out the native people - using
the feeble excuse it wasn't a nation
state.
...
Only a retard would
*believe* that Palestine should be treated like early America -
removing inhabitants.
There clearly is something mentally wrong with somebody that
would treat innocent people so inhumane.
And you honestly do not see this as a mental problem with
them?
###
Spare Bedroom
Subsidy
The spare bedroom subsidy is another lie, there never was a subsidy. This is a tax to punish the poor who now find themselves with an extra bedroom.
Somebody Posted:
Council's
should have sent out a letter:
Dear
Tenant
Up to
now we have been pleased to pay for rooms you don't use. We can no
longer afford to do that, so we won't.
So I
posted in response:
-Council's-
Government should have sent out a letter:
Dear
Tenant
Up to
now we have been pleased to pay for rooms you don't use. This is
because of successive governments incompetence and
maladministration meant we did not build enough homes to place you
better. Unfortunately you will have to pay for our pathetic failure
to act with due care and diligence. This is an injustice to you -
hard luck - no skin off our nose.
BTW: I have heard supposedly intelligent people say, "Why this a tax?". It is really quite easy to understand.
It is a 'tax' because people in their position are entitled to 'free' or subsidised housing.
Because of bad government (see above), they are forced to pay an extra compulsory contribution. An extra tax because of government ineptitude.
###
Political or Police Mistakes
This post is about when politicians or police say they have made a 'mistake'.
When you do something in error - that is called a 'mistake'.
When you do something wrong intentionally - that is not a 'mistake' - it is deliberate wrong-doing.
A bank robber will say he made a mistake when caught - but it was deliberate wrong-doing.
Calling it an 'error of judgement' also means you did not know it was wrong.
Your wife picking a pink hat with a green dress (thinking she will look like a rose) may be an 'error of judgement'.
You picking an expensive car thinking you can afford it may be an 'error of judgement'.
What politicians and police do when caught - is deliberate wrong-doing.
As such they should be put on trial for what they did - if the crime deserved it.
###
"Lessons will be learnt" = "Something we knew already" - more BS and cover-up.
###
Privatisation, Council Houses and
Quangos
Government should not have sold these council houses - they were public property - it was a madness decision. To buy votes. They dubiously sold a public asset - used to home those on low pay, so now we have private landlords making a fortune and housing benefit we cannot afford.
Of
course it was a popular decision for the buying public - they were
getting cheap houses.
Government should also not have sold our water, gas and electricity - they were public property - a con selling it to those that already owned it. It was a madness decision. To screw and defraud the public - like selling our council housing.
I have said many times before - Labour should take back privatised industries. People all realise now it was a con - though most are not sure how.
It was selling us what was already ours - a fraud - so that fat-cats can make profit - not to sell us gas and electric cheap. They have a fiduciary duty to make as much profit as possible from us - Tories knew this.
If you car is stolen or taken using fraud - the police have a duty to return it to you. They do not pay the person who stole it or has it.
Also we should have more council rented housing - which are cheaper - not what we have now which is dearer privatisation rents. Housing benefit has risen because of selling these houses.
Council housing is better for the public than dearer social housing rents (Housing Association) quangos who want to make more money. Even though supposedly non-profit organisations they also charge residents extra for building new houses for others. As the business is expanding they pay for more than their own house. Mathematics.
BTW: All housing sold should be affordable - not ripping off buyers.
The solution is to stop selling social and council housing and build council houses on all the brownfield sites we have in UK.
IMPORTANT - we should have restricted immigration and not be making these new council houses for new foreigners with higher priority.
Socialism isn't about selling houses - it is about helping people live in homes if they cannot afford to buy one.
The public should not subsidise somebody in the private housing market should they?
So - how will the country turn against getting back the electricity and gas companies that was stolen from them?
Quangos are for cowards in government to evade responsibility and to blame somebody else after making negative changes....
###
Police corruption
The problem is MUCH worse than they make out.
Every
police officer who has had the chance to 'blow the whistle' (e.g.
Hillsborough and Muslim rape gangs) has chosen to help cover up the
wrong-doing of his colleagues.
Everybody lies - it is not 'a few rotten apples'
as the media often portray at each exposed case - it is every one
is a rotten apple when given a chance to prove they are not. Proof
I am correct - what are the astronomical odds that every police
officer that knew just happened to be a rotten apple? Obviously
there are other cases when officers have 'blown the whistle' - very
rare brave exceptions - they are 'heroes'.
We
should all respect the police without doubt - but not when these
individuals act wrongly e.g. pervert justice or beat up peaceful
protestors.
###
Financial corruption
The problem is MUCH worse than they make out.
Every
person who had a chance to 'blow the whistle' (e.g. Libor and many
'mis-selling' frauds) has chosen to help cover up the wrong-doing
of colleagues.
Everybody lies - it is not 'a few rotten apples'
as the media often portray at each exposed case - it is every one
is a rotten apple when given a chance to prove they are not.
Obviously there are other cases when people have 'blown the
whistle' - very rare brave exceptions - they are 'heroes'. Unless
they do it to save their skin.
We all
rely on these people in the financial industry and regulators
without doubt, so they should be jailed when acting illegally to
act as powerful deterrent
###
Afghanistan
Quote:
Lady Eliza Manningham-Buller, the former head of MI5, delivered a
withering attack on the invasion of Iraq, decried the term "war on
terror", and held out the prospect of talks with
al-Qaida.
Recording
her first BBC Reith lecture on the theme, Securing Freedom, she
made clear she believed the UK and US governments had not
sufficiently understood the resentment that had been building up
among Arab people, which was only compounded by the war against
Iraq.
Before
an audience which included Theresa May, the home secretary, she
also said the 9/11 attacks were "a crime, not an act of war". "So I
never felt it helpful to refer to a war on terror".
http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2011/sep/02/mi5-war-on-terror-criticism
Indeed
- 9/11 was a crime - not an act of war. Therefore the invasion of a
country (Afghanistan) was an unlawful response. We used the
(deliberately) failed illegal extradition of Bin Laden as pretext
for war. Blair should be on trail for two massive war crimes -
Afghanistan and Iraq invasions.
###
Illegal Wars
In the old days the king used to head his troops to at least share some of the risk of those that will die for him. We should bring this back - with the PM heading the troops - to stop him getting us into stupid or illegal wars.
Our leaders have got much more cowardly since then - they do not mind as much you losing your life - as long as they can sit safely back at home.
Richard
III was the last English monarch to die on the field of battle. Our
corrupt political masters send our young people into battle - they
do not fear for their own personal safety. This is into unlawful
wars using falsified intelligence or a failed illegal extradition
process as a pretext.
###
Quote:
Sally Bercow tweet libelled Lord McAlpine, high court
rules
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2013/may/24/sally-bercow-tweet-libelled-lord-mcalpine
Sally Bercow was innocent.
Mr Justice Tugendhat is mistaken.
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2013/1342.html
38. If
the Tweet does mean that the Claimant abused children, then there
is obviously no dispute that that is one of the most seriously
defamatory allegations which it is possible to make against a
person.
Yes -
obviously.
84. In
my judgment the reasonable reader would understand the words
"innocent face" as being insincere and ironical. There is no
sensible reason for including those words in the Tweet if they are
to be taken as meaning that the Defendant simply wants to know the
answer to a factual question.
Yes -
obviously.
85. The
Defendant does not have any burden of proof in the issue I have to
decide. She does not have to offer an alternative explanation of
why a peer, whose name and career is known to few members of the
public today, might have been trending on 4 November 2012 without
her knowing why he was trending. But where the Defendant is telling
her followers that she does not know why he is trending, and there
is no alternative explanation for why this particular peer was
being named in the tweets which produce the Trend, then it is
reasonable to infer that he is trending because he fits the
description of the unnamed abuser. I find the reader would infer
that. The reader would reasonably infer that the Defendant had
provided the last piece in the jigsaw.
So
then: "She does not have to offer an alternative explanation of why
a peer, whose name and career is known to few members of the public
today, might have been trending on 4 November 2012 without her
knowing why he was trending."
Err..
she obviously did know why and was pretending not to - hence the
*innocent face*.
"..then
it is reasonable to infer that he is trending because he fits the
description of the unnamed abuser."
Why is
it not reasonable to infer that he is trending because he had been
accused - which the judge admits does not imply guilt even if there
was a police inquiry.
Quote:
"If the ordinary sensible man was capable of thinking that wherever
there was a police inquiry there was guilt, it would be almost
impossible to give accurate information about
anything…"
The Judge fails to even acknowledge anything other than "the Defendant had provided the last piece in the jigsaw" - why is it not about her naming him as being accused.
Exactly how it goes further than tweeting about an accusation - even if she believed it was true. Explain Mr Justice how it was more than opinion. Try'
EDIT
for idiots: even if she were to admit that is what she believed -
the statement does not go further than showing her opinion - you
lack objectivity.
BTW for
these same imbeciles: It is NOT repeating an accusation i.e. saying
'McAlpine raped Mr X' - it is a tweet about him being accused of it
by Mr X.
Imagine if we all had to keep quiet about hearing serious accusations with people like Jimmy Savile. Knowingly making false accusations is different.
Fact:
we cannot trust police to investigate 'important' people, as Savile
and MP Cyril Smith *proves* & other alleged cases e.g. ex-MP in
just maids pinny.
His judgement is unsound and promotes a wall of silence towards possible vile abuse of children by 'important' people - I hope unintentionally.
###
Government Wonga Fraud
Our
corrupt government had seen how poor people were extorted by loan
sharks and instead of stopping it they thought, 'That is a
brilliant scam, we should have some of that as tax'. So they
legalised loan-sharking at 5,000% for the poor whilst the rich pay
a few percent.
###
Female Genital Mutilation
Remember in the old days - when people thought female genital mutilation only happened in backward undeveloped countries?
Failure to protect girls from FGM is 'ongoing national scandal', MPs say
It is due to all this rubbish with being positive about multiculturalism (to aid mass immigration).
You cannot offend - you even have to drop your values for the sake of others - go backwards and bring religion into eating of food (Halal).
MPs are the ones responsible - there was always laws protecting children from physical abuse but the pathetic cowards refused to use them.
Jaha Marie Dukureh was a victim of female genital mutilation and the Guardian let subscribers ask her questions. I knew but wanted a poor victims view.
I asked her, "why has it taken so long for somebody to be prosecuted for such a vile crime? Is it due to Multiculturalism and Political Correctness?"
She replied: "Thank you so much for your question, I think it has taken so long because politicians are afraid to deal with other people’s culture and a lot of people feel that the topic is too sensitive to address and they don’t want to come off as racist."
Coward politicians have turned us into one of those sh!thole country that allows Female Genital Mutilation, they don't care about that or those poor girls.
We should deport criminal parents so that they know for certain that they will never get away with this vile crime - no matter when found out. This will certainly stop them as they will lose everything they had. They will blame the partner or relation but both had duty of care.
Quote: It's most prevalent in Djibouti, Egypt, Guinea, and Mali, where 90% or more of women aged 15 to 49 have been subjected to FGM. 29 Jan 2021.
https://www.worldvision.org/child-protection-news-stories/female-genital-mutilation-fgm-facts
The people of Djibouti, Egypt, Guinea, and Mali are Muslim i.e. their religion is Islam - this is hardly a coincidence that all four are Islamic countries.
The sicko woke multiculturalists will say stupid things like, 'what about the victims' - it is too late to save them - we should be saving others at risk.
###
UK
JUSTICE
Quote:
Mother of Iraq soldier killed by friendly fire loses legal aid
backing
Landmark
case against MoD in jeopardy after unemployed Beverley Clarke took
low-paid job – and funds were withdrawn
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/oct/24/mother-iraq-soldier-friendly-fire-loses-legal-aid-david-clarke-beverly-clarke
There
is no justice for the working person - they cannot afford
it.
Just
what the rich Tory ruling class want - the Tory Lite (New Labour)
party are no better.
###
Climate Sceptic
It was called 'Global Warming' of course, until con artists realised that 'Climate Change' was easier to defend when we get very bad cold weather and rain.
Saying as all know that spells of hot weather invokes the cry 'is it climate change? - we have more hot weather now'. While IPCC falsify historical data.
Who is telling you that CO2 is JUST 0.04% of atmosphere BUT is absolutely ESSENTIAL to life on earth and ONLY 3-5% of it manmade (mere 0.0016%)?
Quote: Carbon Dioxide Fertilization Greening Earth, Study Finds - Apr 26, 2016
From a
quarter to half of Earth’s vegetated lands has shown significant
greening over the last 35 years largely due to rising levels of
atmospheric carbon dioxide, according to a new study published in
the journal Nature Climate Change on April 25.
https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2016/carbon-dioxide-fertilization-greening-earth
Anybody who believes that manmade CO2 contribution to our atmosphere (0.0016%) has a real effect on global warming need revaluate their objectivity. Indeed life exploded way back in time when we had more CO2. We even use CO2 to increase growth in large greenhouses - so more global CO2 will increase the crops in fields. Though mans contribution will be minimal - you all can see that can't you - or are you self-retarded?
Government is certainly not telling you that - they need the tax money to waste on projects like fast trains for their rich friends/ supporters (HS2).
Nor telling you that they allow China and other countries to create untold millions tons more CO2 - but will make you pay the price for them.
Is it not just an easy way for governments to charge us for the air we breath? SURELY - if it was so deadly the IPCC and all countries would ban trade with those like China for building hundreds more coal plants - try to prevent increased deadly CO2? Yet they allow it to increase every year - seems IPCC lie.
I am not a denialist just sceptic, with good reason. The climate may get warmer, but will have very little or nothing to do with our miniscule 0.0016% CO2
So some of you rabid evangelists know where to put your slurs and false misrepresentations.
Indeed, climate is always changing - climate could get cooler or hotter - the 95% certainty by 'experts' is purely a gut feel - not scientific at all.
There
is no scientific skepticism in their research - it is all about
confirming a belief that the world is warming and man is to blame.
Yes, unbelievably scientists should be sceptics too - until it is
proven beyond any doubt. Scientifically & politically it is
done and dusted, sceptics are now called denialists. They're
clearly driven by dogma - mans nanoscopic 0.0016% contribution of
CO2 to the atmosphere is enough to cause global warming - no
objectivity.
My scepticism is because of bad science e.g. closing weather stations all over the world whilst comparing data with new ones built elsewhere plus removing unreliable proxy data from charts only after it diverged from dogma but keeping it in from before. Also propaganda like with recent (2013/14) English weather e.g. Dawlish rail always had similar weather problems with the track - this was presented as a new problem because of global warming.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winter_storms_of_2013%E2%80%9314_in_the_United_Kingdom
Well - not just because of the bad science - it is we always hear more about scams and lies from them e.g. Carbon offsetting is a new scam when the rich corporations pass on the extra cost to customers - just lately 18 Jan 2023:
Revealed: more than 90% of rainforest carbon offsets by biggest certifier are worthless, analysis shows. The forest carbon offsets approved by the world’s leading certifier and used by Disney, Shell, Gucci and other big corporations are largely worthless and could make global heating worse, according to a new investigation. The research into Verra, the world’s leading carbon standard for the rapidly growing $2bn (£1.6bn) voluntary offsets market, has found that, based on analysis of a significant percentage of the projects, more than 90% of their rainforest offset credits – among the most commonly used by companies – are likely to be “phantom credits” and do not represent genuine carbon reductions.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/jan/18/revealed-forest-carbon-offsets-biggest-provider-worthless-verra-aoe
They have closed many weather stations. As to moving of weather stations example - quote: The Hadley Centre's CET calculation has recently undergone a major change, involving the replacement of several of the contributing stations. Their series is now based on Stonyhurst (Lancs), Pershore (Worcs) and Rothamsted (Herts), all of which are Campbell Automatic Weather Stations. The Philip Eden series continues to emulate Manley's original work which calculates the mean between the Oxford district and the Lancashire Plain, and no changes have been introduced to this series in recent months. You can draw your own conclusions as to the efficacy of the Hadley Centre's change. http://www.climate-uk.com/CETcheck.htm
LATEST 2013: Met Office admit a warming pause when it should be rising faster: "The start of the current pause is difficult to determine precisely. Although 1998 is often quoted as the start of the current pause...It is only really since 2000 that the rise in global surface temperatures has paused."
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/media/pdf/q/0/Paper2_recent_pause_in_global_warming.PDF
N.B.
Spoiler alert - they blame ocean uptake - like there was no ocean
uptake before - so what stopped it?
Recent
propaganda is implying man-made global warming increased rainfall -
causing recent flooding problems in England. A big thing was made
of January 2014 being wettest ever for England - though January
1948 was so close it can to be thought of as to be the same (156.9
compared to 158.2). I would say that the great storms of February
1287 (when whole areas of coastline were redrawn) and December 1703
(one of the most severe ever recorded) were a lot worse - but your
'experts' will likely disagree, as man-made warming cannot be
blamed. Check yourself.
The
important thing is trend. Wettest *recorded* February is 1923,
March 1947, April 2012, May 1967, June 2012, July 2009, August
2012, September 1918, October 2000, November 1929 and December
1914. One off bad months prove nothing - even them pretending it
was not wetter before records.
They
say it is about CO2 - if higher countries cut to UK usage per
capita and lower countries did not increase theirs then the
man-made CO2 problem will be resolved - if it ever existed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_carbon_dioxide_emissions
This is purely used as an excuse to tax us more - so-called green
tax - when we in UK are good compared to bad guys like America - it
is another scam.
Let us start with something simple - which you can easily check yourself. Do not take my word or anybody elses - trust yourself.
Here is the official dataset - try prove from that that the trend has been getting wetter for over 100 years since 1910.
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/pub/data/weather/uk/climate/datasets/Rainfall/date/England.txt
I could not - perhaps you can do better - please look yourself. It is the only thing which will convince some close-minded people - and then not always.
The first chart is from the Met Office. It is very important to note they have invented a new trendline methodology - the "Smoothed Kernel Filter" - only 12 links on google. Why is that? Why are the Met Office not using standard methods like a "10 year moving average"? Why are they letting people think winters are getting wetter in England when that is not true? English winters have actually got drier since 1910.
If ALL other countries copied our UK usage per capita then the man-made CO2 problem will be resolved - if it ever existed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_carbon_dioxide_emissions
This is
purely being used as an excuse to tax us more - so-called green tax
- when we in UK are good compared to bad guys like America - it is
another scam.
Quote: The first trouble experienced with the line, after opening in May 1846, was in December 1852 at Breeches Rock between Teignmouth and Dawlish. Héavy rain caused a spring to, break out from a soft vein, resulting in the collapse of the cliff onto the railway. After a similar occurrence in February 1853, the gradient of the cliff face was eased and drainage work carried out, but it was not enough toprevent a slightfall in October of the saine year. This illustra-tion shows the result of the first attack on the line from the other side. Easter~y gales during the first fortnight of February 1855 had washed away the beach near Teignmouth, exposing the marl on which the railway and sea wall were built. Heavy seas scoured the marl and despite remedial work 30yd of wall collapsed on the 16th. Severe frosts and turbulent seas prevented reconstruction, and by the time work could begin 50yd of the embankment had been washed away..
http://www.mtholyoke.edu/courses/rschwart/ind_rev/iln/accident.htm
Look at the raw data - can you see any change in rainfall?
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/hadobs/hadukp/data/monthly/HadEWP_monthly_qc.txt
Here it is in graph form - there is no noticeable change.
The
other argument - that winter is also getting wetter - is another
lie. Even the Met Office graphs do not show this. Why then are they
letting people think winters are getting wetter when that is not
true?. Please - trust yourself - see what you believe
then.
Regarding the recent flooding - here is an analogy for you:
Our government are in charge of the Titanic and they have forewarning it is going to sink - so what do they do?
They build more decks on it so more people will drown (their excuse being that they have decks there already anyway).
That is the consequence for our continued building on flood plains and in areas prone to flooding (including current villages and towns).
We have idiots for our leaders and are doomed to stay that way.
###
Why did our scientists join IPCC for global warming in 1988 - when the temperature had been coming down since the war? Maybe they had a crystal ball and could tell the futures. No silly - perhaps they thought that the UK was immune and indeed could reverse global warming. That must be it ;)
If UK temperature came down in the UK for the next 42 years the public and scientists would be 100% more sceptical - wouldn't they?
Please check this yourself - the Central England Temperatures. Taking the data they had since the end of war up to 1987, did our British scientists really believe we could reverse global warming when they went into the IPCC?
Does
anybody know how many millions of pounds funding have they received
since then? Was future funding the primary influence
then?
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/hadobs/hadcet/cetml1659on.dat
I have to thank Tony Heller for this following information - his videos debunking Global Warming are most informative. He exposes the liars.
https://www.youtube.com/c/TonyHeller
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) says this;
Quote: One of the most remarkable aspects of the paleoclimate record is the strong correspondence between temperature and the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere observed during the glacial cycles of the past several hundred thousand years. When the carbon dioxide concentration goes up, temperature goes up. When the carbon dioxide concentration goes down, temperature goes down.
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/globalwarming/temperature-change.html
Except
they are clearly telling fibs - because they say
"Temperature change (blue) and carbon dioxide change
(red)" - the temperatures is clearly leading the CO2 - not
the other way around i.e. When the temperature
goes down, carbon dioxide concentration goes
down.
Somebody wrote to me about that saying, "it did amplify the warming" - but with high CO2 the temperature was coming down - not going up.
At the bottom of this page - look in zoomed in detail at the last 100,000 years:
At the
beginning of this period - you can clearly see that temperature
(blue) is bringing down CO2 (red).
In the
middle - temperature starts to rise - CO2 follows.
Towards the end - temperature reaches a peak - CO2
follows.
Three Final Thoughts
1. Government will tax the very air that you breath if they could get away with it. A 'green tax' (for our own good) is one way of doing it. The working class are taxed disproportionately, green tax like VAT is regressive - more punitive to poor than the rich. So government use to control working class (not rich).
2. Guess what mass immigration does to the UK. Do millions more make it easier or much harder for us to fight cutting CO2 emissions (for self-retarded)?
3. Not at all suspicious to you that Chinese CO2 from coal has not increased at all since 2012 - despite them building hundreds of new coal stations?
Whatever CO2 we in UK save - no matter how
much green taxes we pay - China will increase world emissions - we
cannot stop it. Get it into your self-retarded head - we will all
be paying massive amount of tax for their 'crime'. What do you not
understand - stop pretending to be a moron.
THINK - Is it at all possible that it does not matter much i.e. we double manmade tiny amount of CO2 AND even double natural CO2 (total 0.04% up to massive 0.08%) thus increase growth of crops? Final FACT for you - we had more CO2 giving a massive increase of life in earths history.
WHY exactly do the IPCC and authorities need to LIE and alter historical data - IF they are telling the truth?
Paedophiles in Position of Power - (allegedly)
& cover up allegation. The big lie of the inquiry (there will be others) will be that the cover up was historic but in truth it continues until the present day. In actual truth at least one ex-MP it is alleged to have had sex with a boy and has not been questioned by the police. Simon Danczuk MP was told not to “out” Parliamentarians as suspect paedophiles, as it could kill him.
Perhaps Met Police have been protecting them - nonces looking after nonces?
Quote: Three former Met Police officers accused of child sex abuse image ‘conspiracy’
Chief Inspector Richard Watkinson was found dead on the day he was
due to be charged, while two retired officers face
court
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/met-police-paedophiles-charges-conspiracy-b2265355.html
'Cabinet
Minister in seized child porn' by James
Fielding
Sunday
Express - 23 February 2014
A
former Cabinet minister was featured in a video seized by
customs officers
during a child porn raid more than 30 years ago.
The MP
appeared on amateur footage shot in Amsterdam, the
Sunday Express
has been told. The video, discovered on a coach
travelling from
the Continent, was seized at Dover in 1982, following
intelligence that
the politician was involved. A number of child porn films
were retrieved,
including a video showcase of 34 British boys who had
been smuggled
into the Netherlands from care homes in Britain. Another
video,
with the title Amsterdam Tramway Museum, had a few minutes
of
tram
footage before flickering into hardcore images of children
being
abused.
A
customs source would not say whether the ex-MP took part in any
abuse on
camera but added: "This person, a member of the Cabinet,
was involved
and that's why officers had to seize the video.
Department heads
later took over and that was the last seen of the
material."
An HMRC
spokesman said: "We can find no trace of these videos so
are not in
a position to confirm in any way if a prominent MP was
involved."
There
is a cover-up - government will like you to think that there is no
depravity in power. If big
Cyril
Smith got covered up then how many others?
Quote: The Paedophile MP: How Cyril Smith Got Away with It
How MP
Cyril Smith got away with child abuse
During
his lifetime Cyril Smith was one of the UK's best-known
politicians. But a new investigation shows that security services
held on to a file with evidence of the Liberal MP's child
abuse.
Cyril
Smith, the Rochdale MP who died in 2010, was a larger than life
figure.
His
jocular personality and his regular appearances on chat shows made
him one of the best-known politicians in the country.
But an
investigation by Channel 4's Dispatches programme shows that UK
security services held on to evidence of the Liberal MP's child
abuse.
In the
late 1960s Lancashire police carried out several investigations
into Smith's behaviour, compiling an 80-page file. The suggestion
is that police were ready to prosecute.
However,
veiled threats from local liberals meant the case was dropped and
the file locked away in a safe at Special Branch, which has
responsibility for national security. Labour MP Jack McCann,
Smith's predecessor as MP for Rochdale, also spoke to the DPP on
Smith's behalf.
By
1977, the Liberal party was the junior party in a pact with the
country's ruling Labour party. MI5 now also took an interest in
Smith's background.
Former
Special Branch detective Tony Robinson told Dispatches he was
contacted by MI5, who requested he send them the file by special
courier. By now Lancashire police, Special Branch and MI5 knew
about the allegations.
Lord
Steel, who as David Steel led the Liberal party between 1976 and
1988, says he asked Smith about the allegations of child abuse and
accepted his denial of wrongdoing.
In
Rochdale, Smith set up a hostel, Cambridge House, supposedly to
help boys in need.
Dispatches
spoke to one man, Kevin Griffiths, a former resident at the hostel,
who first told the police about the Rochdale MP's
behaviour.
Mr
Griffiths recalls how, on one occasion, he stood naked in front of
Smith "and he ran his hands all up and down my thighs, inside my
legs, and touched my private parts".
Smith
went on to help set up another institution in Rochdale, Knowl View
School, for which he held a set of keys. It was there that Chris
Marshall, then eight years old, became Smith's youngest known
victim.
And the
Metropolitan police have confirmed to Dispatches that during the
1980s Smith was a visitor to the
Elm guest house in south west
London, where a paedophile ring was
reported to have been active.
http://www.channel4.com/news/cyril-smith-child-abuse-mi5-rochdale-elm
Benefits System
To declare an interest; I have been seriously ill - being forced to retire after a couple of operations went wrong at Papworth in 1997 (Hiatus hernia). Details are on my skilled.org (to be uploaded). Since then my health has got a lot worse - I had an aneurysm rupture in 2010. I survived only because of being on the MRI scanner at hospital at the time. There were complications, which meant that I was transferred from Addenbrookes ICU to Papworth ICU and back to Addenbrookes ICU again. I had to be induced into a coma, given a tracheostomy and put on kidney dialysis. It left me with even more health problems as my lungs were damaged and it split my artery from chest to stomach so I now have another aneurysm which my surgeon says is unsafe to operate on.
Update: 2016 survived burst ulcers (stress?) and rebleed, stopping commitment to inequality until 2022 after mild stroke prompted me to have another go.
Some will ask, "Why are you such a wuss?" i.e. weak and ineffectual person. Why I state health problems and am not pounding door of 10 Downing St. I have contacted most of news media you see on a daily basis - especially those Left leaning like Guardian newspaper editors. Here is why I stopped 2016:
insert photo**********************************************
***********************************************************
Here is one of my posts on Guardian before they banned me:
To make a general comment; with all the propaganda from the media and people like IDS and Lord Freud, I wonder if those who say 'people on benefits are scroungers' think the same when they cannot get another job after being made redundant at 50 plus (with untold thousands of younger and fitter workers being imported) - or become too sick to work themselves. Somehow I think not - these people likely then realise just how stupid they have been.
As I
say, this started in 1997 when my health worsenned when going back
part-time for therapeutic work. They used the worsenning health as
excuse to stop benefits. When I dared ask for them to reconsider
and requested to go to an independant tribunal they wanted a refund
of all benefits they had paid. Bet you don't believe me - is this
what you wokers and multiculturalists call my white
privilege?
ATOS - DWP lackies?
ATOS
almost killed me. I had a 'medical' due with ATOS in 2009 but they
contacted my GP and admitted my health was too bad and I need not
come.
I filled in the form last year (2013) and informed them my
condition had greatly worsened as explained above after the
ruptured aneurysm in 2010.
I also informed them about the current large aneurysm - which was
growing every year and how it may be very injurious for me to
attend with the stress (knowing how their 'medicals' work). I also
advised them that my surgeon had told me it is very important that
my blood pressure is well controlled below 140/80. I have high
blood pressure anyway without this added worry (only mildly
controlled with medication). On the form I wrote they should
contact the GP again (or surgeon). Needless to say they sent a
letter telling me I had to attend - to which I rang to see if it
was not a 'mistake'.
I was told I had to go. I was holding my chest in pain through 50
minutes of interview until the nurse finally (presumably thinking
holding chest was a ploy) took my blood pressure. She promptly
cancelled the 'medical' as the systolic BP was high at 165. All
documented and official ATOS audio is available.
BTW:
"fraud is an act of deception intended for personal gain or
to cause a loss to another party"
http://www.sfo.gov.uk/fraud/what-is-fraud.aspx.
News
February 2014 is that ATOS are to be dumped - great. However, the
new lackies will still be acting for the DWP. We need proper
medicals taking a persons illness into account (not ignored). How
*everybody* will want to be treated if it was THEMSELVES or their
children who was seriously ill.
Here is somebody secret filming whilst working for ATOS:
It seems the new bosses taking over from ATOS (MAXIMUS) are just as bad.
One quote from a new employee in America: "It seems like not one person knows what is going on. Things change on a daily basis and they expect you to make these insane quotas, they are not about their employees they are about the numbers. The turnover is the worst I have ever seen. Forget going to HR with a problem either because they will not help you. My manager is probably the worst, I don't think anything that gets said is ever the truth. They will write you up for nothing. This place is a joke, I can't wait to get out of here."
Advice to Management: "Just give up, your employees are not happy, your managers lie, the team leads are horrible to other employees and don't have a clue as to what is going on. I'm pretty sure the federal government could find a way better place to do business with."
http://www.glassdoor.co.uk/Reviews/Employee-Review-MAXIMUS-RVW2291973.htm
GDP to surpass pre-financial crisis levels.
Would you believe that some idiots use GDP as an indicator of our material standard of living.
It is usually those corrupt people in government at the time and their supporters.
Can you fix your old car or buy a new one with our countries GDP figure - does it pay your increasingly higher utility bills?
No - you cannot and no it does not.
The wealthy are the only ones that are ever prospering - the gap between rich and your pay gets ever wider.
Greedy fat cats give themselves massive wage rises and bonuses - whilst holding down your wages.
As I have said hundreds of times - it is clearly is now no longer just greed - it is avarice - insatiable greed.
The government must think we are all mugs.
BTW: For idiot trolls supporting this Tory run government - GDP is NOT a measure of PERSONAL income.
FINALLY in 2023 the BBC get around to admittin truth:
Inequality: GDP growth doesn't tell us how income is split across a population - rising GDP could result from the richest getting richer, rather than everyone becoming better off
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-13200758
###
The Diesel Scam
Quote: Diesel's popularity with motorists has surged, but its green image was an illusion.
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/aug/06/diesel-scandal-cheap-fuel-choking-cities
No -
you are wrong - it was not an illusion - it was a deception. Not a
mistake but a lie - they knew at time about danger of
emissions.
Why are
these liars not brought to account - we have been poisoning our
children because of their lies. Do you not care???
They
are criminals causing grievous bodily harm and death - why are the
cowardly government not making them culpable?
Presumably because they do not want to be made culpable when they have been found out to have been lying to us.
Electric car anyone - many unable to be charge even one car outside home, (also generating capacity - which they will exort massive cost)...
People were paid again for using less electricity - before everybody was forced to get electric cars - are they self-retarded or real morons?
...or Global Warming for those who have to use plastic cutlery in case they may stab themselves with a fork in the eye while feeding...
BTW: Electric cars are about 30% heavier, so many more deaths - also minor crashes will result in more injuries - those ignorant have been warned.
###
Is this Fraud?
British Gas
We bought a new boiler and it broke down after the guarantee ran out. BG said boilers are not covered by the Sale of Goods Act (an untruth) but told us that we could pay for a pricey maintenance contract though or pay for the repair. Which we were forced to do. It was either that or pay thousands for a new boiler. Clearly we are not the only ones made to pay with BG - or is it just boilers - or is BG alone in this bad practice. There are likely millions of us.
The Sale of Goods Act states: "For the purposes of this Act, goods are of satisfactory quality if they meet the standard that a reasonable person would regard as satisfactory, taking account of any description of the goods, the price (if relevant) and all the other relevant circumstances". The boiler broke down again 9 months after the repair, possibly with a different bit. If so we have to pay again. For ignorant employees; the goods as a whole have to be 'fit for purpose', not just parts of it. If you paid thousands for something is it of satisfactory quality if it broke down every 9 months with a different bit?
Again
- "fraud is an act of deception intended for personal gain or
to cause a loss to another party"
http://www.sfo.gov.uk/fraud/what-is-fraud.aspx.
OFCOM
Ofcom allow ISP's to sell slow speed broadband at high speed prices. They also allow ISP's to falsely sell unlimited broadband which is in fact limited. This allowed our ISP (Supanet) to cut the 'fair usage' to 15 Gigabyte without telling us and then try to defraud us i.e. we had to either to upgrade our supposed 'unlimited' service to a fixed limit at extra cost or pay a charge for our 'overuse'. At least Ofcom admitted that our ISP acted wrongly - we won our case against the corrupt ISP. Unfortunately though Ofcom would not check who else our ISP did this to. So - do not think this is an isolated 'mistake'. They, like all other regulators, are merely PR for their industry - nothing more than damage limitation.
Regulators all protect greedy corrupt bosses with the smallest action i.e. individual compensation when they can get away with it - and massive fines paid by customers and investors at worst. They may think they do it to protect the markets - but it has the opposite effect - hence the recent bank crash.
YOU PAY THEIR FINES
GSK fined $3bn (£1.9bn)
July 2012
The pharmaceutical group GlaxoSmithKline has been fined $3bn
(£1.9bn) after admitting bribing doctors and encouraging the
prescription of unsuitable antidepressants to children. Glaxo is
also expected to admit failing to report safety problems with the
diabetes drug Avandia in a district court in Boston on
Thursday.
Despite the large fine, $3bn is far less than the profits made from
the drugs. Avandia has made $10.4bn in sales, Paxil took $11.6bn,
and Wellbutrin sales were $5.9bn during the years covered by the
settlement, according to IMS Health, a data group that consults for
drug makers.
http://www.theguardian.com/business/2012/jul/03/glaxosmithkline-fined-bribing-doctors-pharmaceuticals
You pay their fines - so why should they be
worried?
GSK fined £297m September 2014
GlaxoSmithKline has been found guilty of bribery by a Chinese court
and has agreed to pay a fine of 3bn yuan (£297m) to the government
in Beijing.
At the same time, the former head of its China division, Mark
Reilly, and other GSK executives are facing two- to four-year jail
terms, according to the state news agency, Xinhua. Reilly was
accused of running a "massive bribery network".
The bribery case involved allegations that GSK sales executives
paid up to 3bn yuan to doctors to encourage them to use its
drugs.
http://www.theguardian.com/business/2014/sep/19/glaxosmithkline-pays-297m-fine-china-bribery
The Chinese courts can prosecute individuals for lesser
crime - yet our courts cannot - was this just for
PR?
See end of page for Defamation
INTJ
personality - my personality test for those
interested
It’s lonely at the top, and being one of the
rarest and most strategically capable personality types, INTJs know
this all too well. INTJs form just two percent of the population,
and women of this personality type are especially rare, forming
just 0.8% of the population – it is often a challenge for them to
find like-minded individuals who are able to keep up with their
relentless intellectualism and chess-like maneuvering. INTJs are
imaginative yet decisive, ambitious yet private, amazingly curious,
but only if their interest is piqued.
Smart and
unconventional
INTJ_1With a natural thirst for knowledge that
shows itself early in life, INTJs are often given the title of
“bookworm” as children. While this may be intended as an insult by
their peers, they more than likely identify with it and are even
proud of it, greatly enjoying their broad and deep body of
knowledge. INTJs enjoy sharing what they know as well, confident in
their mastery of their chosen subjects, but owing to their
Intuitive (N) and Judging (J) traits, they prefer to design and
execute a brilliant plan within their field rather than share
opinions on “uninteresting” distractions like gossip.
"You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your informed opinion. No one is entitled to be ignorant." ~ Harlan Ellison
A paradox to most observers, INTJs are able to live by glaring contradictions that nonetheless make perfect sense – from a rational perspective. For example, INTJs are simultaneously the most starry-eyed idealists and the bitterest of cynics, a seemingly impossible conflict. But this is because INTJ types tend to believe that with effort, intelligence and consideration, nothing is impossible, while at the same time they believe that people are too lazy, short-sighted or self-serving to actually achieve those fantastic results. Yet that cynical view of reality is unlikely to stop an interested INTJ from achieving a result they believe to be relevant.
Independence personified
INTJs radiate self-confidence and an aura of mystery, and their
insightful observations, original ideas and formidable logic enable
them to push change through with sheer willpower and force of
personality. At times it will seem that INTJs are bent on
deconstructing and rebuilding every idea and system they come into
contact with, employing a sense of perfectionism and even morality
to this work. Anyone who doesn’t have the talent to keep up with
INTJs’ processes, or worse yet, doesn’t see the point of them, is
likely to immediately and permanently lose their
respect.
Rules, limitations and traditions are anathema to the INTJ personality type – everything should be open to questioning and reevaluation, and if they see a way, INTJs will often act unilaterally to enact their technically superior, sometimes insensitive, and almost always unorthodox methods and ideas.
This isn’t to be misunderstood as impulsiveness – INTJs will strive to remain rational no matter how attractive the end goal may be, and every idea, whether generated internally or soaked in from the outside world, must pass the ruthless and ever-present “Is this going to work?” filter. This mechanism is applied at all times, to all things and all people, and this is often where INTJ personality types run into trouble.
...yet not everything can be
analyzed
INTJs are brilliant and confident in bodies of knowledge they have taken the time to understand, but unfortunately the social contract is unlikely to be one of those subjects. White lies and small talk are hard enough as it is for a type that craves truth and depth, but INTJs will go so far as to see many social conventions as downright stupid. Ironically, it is often best for them to remain where they are comfortable – out of the spotlight – where the natural confidence prevalent in INTJs as they work with the familiar can serve as its own beacon, attracting people, romantically or otherwise, of similar temperament and interests.
INTJs are defined by their tendency to move through life as though it were a giant chess board, pieces constantly shifting with consideration and intelligence, always assessing new tactics, strategies and contingency plans, constantly outmaneuvering their peers in order to maintain control of a situation while maximizing their freedom to move about. This isn’t meant to suggest that INTJs act without conscience, but to many Feeling (F) types, INTJs’ distaste for acting on emotion can make it seem that way, and it explains why many fictional villains (and misunderstood heroes) are modeled on this personality type.
INTJ strengths and
weaknesses
INTJ Strengths
High self-confidence. INTJ personalities rarely doubt
themselves or care much about their perceived social roles,
expectations, etc. Consequently, they are not afraid to voice their
own opinions. This exudes confidence and reinforces the INTJ’s
self-esteem even further.
Quick and versatile mind. INTJs are very good at improving
their knowledge of (often diverse) topics and fields that interest
them. People with this personality type take pleasure in tackling
intellectual challenges, and their natural curiosity pushes them
forward as well.
Jacks-of-all-trades. The most important strength of any INTJ
is their mind. Other personality types pride themselves on being
artistic, intuitive, convincing, athletic, etc. In contrast, INTJs
excel at being able to analyze anything that life throws at them,
uncovering the underlying methodology and then applying it in
practice. Consequently, INTJ personalities are usually able to
become what they want to become—be it an IT architect or a
high-flying politician.
Independent and decisive. People with the INTJ personality
type are ruthless when it comes to analyzing the usefulness of
methods or ideas. They could not care less if that idea is popular
or supported by an authority figure. If the INTJ believes that it
does not make sense, only overwhelming rational arguments will
convince them otherwise. This strength makes them efficient and
impartial decision-makers, often at a very young age. INTJs also
tend to be quite resistant to conflicts, usually remaining rational
and calm in an emotionally charged situation.
Hard-working and determined. INTJ personalities can be very
patient and dedicated if something excites or intrigues them. They
will work hard to achieve their goals, often ignoring everything
else. That being said, INTJs may also appear lazy in situations
that do not require them to flex their mental muscles. For
instance, they may take risks and not study that hard at school,
knowing that in all likelihood, they will be able to tackle the
tests anyway.
Imaginative and strategic. INTJs are very good strategic
thinkers, often using this strength to devise multiple contingency
plans in both professional and personal situations. They like to
plan ahead and be prepared, imagining all the potential scenarios
and consequences.
Honest and direct. People with this personality type hate
playing social games and putting comfort or social expectations
above honesty and facts. INTJs tend to see these activities as
pointless and irrational, preferring inconvenient truth over a
comforting lie.
Open-minded. INTJ personalities do not mind being proven
wrong and enjoy being exposed to something they were not familiar
with. They will embrace a competing theory if it makes more sense,
regardless of the existing traditions or expectations. Not
surprisingly, INTJs also tend to be fairly liberal in a social
sense, believing that many social norms are outdated and
unnecessarily restrictive.
INTJ Weaknesses
Arrogant. There is a fine line between confidence and
arrogance. Some less mature INTJs may overestimate the importance
of their knowledge or analytical skills, seeing most other people
as irrational or intellectually inferior, often making their
opinion known.
Perfectionists. INTJ personalities loathe inefficiency and
imperfection, trying very hard to iron out all the flaws and
analyze all possibilities. If left unchecked, this trait can easily
become a weakness, slowing down their work quite significantly and
frustrating people around the INTJ.
Likely to over-analyze everything. INTJs tend to believe that
everything can be analyzed, even things that are not necessarily
rational, e.g., human relationships. They may seek logical
explanations and solutions in every situation, refusing to rely on
improvisation or their own emotions.
Judgmental. INTJs reach their conclusions very quickly and
stick to them. Even though people with this personality type tend
to be open-minded, they have little patience for things they
consider illogical, e.g., decisions based on feelings, irrational
stubbornness, emotional outbursts, etc. An INTJ is likely to
believe that someone who behaves in this way is either very
immature or irrational; consequently, they will have little respect
for them.
May be insensitive. INTJ personalities often pride themselves
on being brutally honest and logical. However, while their
statements may be rational and completely correct, they may not
take into account another person’s emotional state, background,
individual circumstances, etc. Consequently, the INTJ’s directness
and honesty may easily hurt other people, thus becoming a major
weakness in social situations.
Often clueless when it comes to romantic relationships. Many
INTJs are likely to have difficulties dealing with anything that
does not require logical reasoning, and this weakness is especially
visible in interpersonal relationships. They may overanalyze
everything, get frustrated trying to understand how the other
person thinks, try to use a nearly scientific approach to dating,
or just give up altogether.
Loathe highly structured environments. INTJ personalities do
not respect rules or regulations just because they are there; they
need to be confident that those restrictions make sense.
Consequently, INTJs strongly dislike environments that are built on
blind obedience, traditions, or respect for authority. They are
likely to challenge the status quo and clash with people who prefer
stability and safety.
INTJ personality and
emotions
The INTJ personality type is perhaps the most enigmatic and
controversial of all. Idealistic visionaries, unemotional robots,
brilliant strategists, socially awkward geeks, fearsome debaters –
these are just a few examples of the numerous labels that INTJs
seem to be able to get.
There is usually little middle ground with strong expressed INTJ
personalities – other types either find their quirkiness mysterious
and attractive, or feel uncomfortable and get offended. The INTJs
themselves are either proud of their traits and wear them like a
badge, or see themselves as eccentrics and do their best to mimic
the behavior of other people, trying to blend in. These attitudes
soften as people grow and develop, but they tend to be very
black-and-white at a younger age.
The Achilles' heel
One of the most significant sticking points is the INTJs’ handling
of emotions. Most INTJ personalities pride themselves in remaining
rational and logical at all times, seeing most emotional displays
as a sign of weakness and irrationality. As people with this
personality type also tend to be very honest and straightforward,
it is no surprise that they are often seen as insensitive. Some
INTJs may go even further, claiming that they have no feelings or
emotions at all, and that anyone who does is weak and
irrational.
Ironically, INTJs can be just as emotional, if not more so, than any other personality type. Everything depends on how we define and handle emotions – for instance, there is a world of difference between breaking down in public and simply being thoughtful or amused. For most INTJs, public displays of emotion are outside of their comfort zone and consequently they will do their best to restrain themselves. However, this does not mean that INTJs have no feelings – rather, they tend to be good at channeling their emotions and using logic to keep them in check.
Why all the shields?
One of the reasons behind the cold exterior is that people with the
INTJ personality type tend to be very proud of their knowledge and
abilities – revealing emotions or even acknowledging that they
exist may be a frightening prospect, especially if the INTJ in
question is younger and secretly not as confident as they would
like to be. In such cases, the INTJ will shield themselves with
coldness and rational arguments, allowing their Thinking trait to
act like a protective big brother to the weaker, less developed
Feeling trait.
Second, logic and rationality play a dominant role in the INTJ decision-making process – feelings usually only come into play when their Thinking trait cannot come up with a rational solution to a difficult problem. To give an example, if an INTJ is upset, they will not need to tell everyone around them that they are upset – on the contrary, they will focus on identifying why they are upset and then coming up with a logical solution to their problems. Alternatively, they will channel that energy into something productive.
Emotions will always influence the decisions that the INTJ is making, at least to some extent – it is impossible to separate the two, even though most people with the INTJ personality type try hard to make decisions and solve problems without involving their feelings.
How we process is also how we feel, and how we feel is also how we process – this applies to INTJs as well. However, people with this personality type find it quite easy to deal with those emotions internally, without exposing them to the outside world, and this is why they may radiate that aura of logic and detachment.
So, to summarize – INTJ personalities can be very sensitive and have very deep feelings. Even though these emotions will be shielded from the public view by their Thinking trait and will (usually) not be the deciding factor in the INTJ decision-making process, this does not mean that INTJs should be seen as, or should aspire to be, cold-blooded and insensitive geniuses living by the mantra that emotions are for the weak. This is not the case and is not going to happen.
INTJ relationships
INTJ personalities are likely to have significant difficulties when
it comes to relationships. INTJs spend a large part of their lives
in their heads; consequently, what they see and understand
intuitively can be much more advanced than a “bland” reality. As a
result, someone with the INTJ personality may find it challenging
to merge that fantasy and those high requirements with reality.
Unfortunately, their superior logic and imagination may actually
hinder the INTJ when they start looking for a partner.
A plan for everything
People with this personality type are likely to apply a rational
approach to dating and relationships as well. An INTJ is likely to
have a “checklist” in their mind long before they actually start
thinking about a relationship. It is also likely that “he/she must
be rational” will be at the top of their list of criteria—and this
is exactly what usually holds the INTJ back, especially if they are
male.
There are certain rules (e.g., do not appear too interested) and types of behavior (e.g., a girl should not start the conversation) that a person interested in finding a dating partner is expected to follow, and unfortunately for INTJs, the majority of people will follow those rules. Even those potential partners who an INTJ would normally see as rational will probably yield to societal expectations. Consequently, INTJs are likely to get quite disappointed after the first few attempts at dating and may even start thinking that everybody else is either irrational or intellectually inferior.
INTJs are bewilderingly deep and intelligent people, bringing a lot of stability and insight into their romantic relationships, but that extraordinary intelligence is also their main enemy in this area.
Paradoxically, someone with the INTJ personality is most likely to attract a romantic partner when they are not actually looking for one. As most INTJs have difficulties with dating and relationships, their self-confidence takes a major hit in those situations, and the INTJ then overcompensates by showing off their intelligence, which makes them even more unattractive. Only when the INTJ returns to his or her usual self does their self-confidence start glowing again, which makes it much easier for them to attract a partner.
What am I supposed to say
now?..
INTJs are uncomfortable expressing their feelings or trying to
understand the emotions of other people. They also have a tendency
to always trust their knowledge and understanding. Not
surprisingly, INTJs can sometimes inadvertently hurt other people,
especially during the dating phase and even later in the
relationship. The mind of the INTJ personality is geared toward
looking at conflict situations as logical puzzles worthy of
analysis, which does not always help when their relationship
partner does not share the same notion of fun.
That said, if both partners manage to survive the rocky start during the dating phase, it is very likely that the relationship will be very deep and strong and the INTJ will do everything they can to ensure it stays that way, as long as their significant other reciprocates. INTJs are likely to be very imaginative and enthusiastic partners - however, it is important that the INTJ does not fall into a habit of spending more time theorizing about intimacy than communicating with their partner.
What if it does not work
out?
People with the INTJ personality type may terminate the
relationship if they are confident that it is at risk of breaking
down, and they will not look back. INTJs’ approach to dating is
quite similar: they will not keep trying if their mind is telling
them that the likelihood of a strong relationship is very low.
However, the calm exterior can be deceiving; it is more than likely
that the INTJ will feel very hurt inside and spend extensive
amounts of time figuring out what went wrong, especially if they
had devoted a lot of time to dating or making the relationship
work.
Preferred partners: ENFP and ENTP types, as their Extraversion (E) and Prospecting (P) traits counterbalance INTJs’ Introversion (I) and Judging (J) traits. INFJs are also a very strong match as the intuitive connection between INTJ and INFJ is likely to be instantaneous.
INTJ friends
It is not easy to become an INTJ’s friend. People with this
personality type value rationality and intelligence more than
anything else and tend to automatically assume that most of the
individuals they meet are likely to be less intelligent than they
are. Most would probably call it arrogance; INTJs would rationalize
this as a natural filtering mechanism and argue that most people
simply bore them. Consequently, INTJs tend to have very few good
friends, but they also do not really see the need to have a big
social circle.
INTJ personalities are very independent and self-sufficient. They see their friends more as intellectual soul mates than as sources of social validation and assurance.
INTJs will happily come up with new ways to improve and deepen the relationship, but they will not be dependent on their friends emotionally. Furthermore, it is quite unlikely that the INTJ will enjoy physical manifestations of feelings (hugs, touches, etc.), even with close friends.
No crying on my shoulder!
INTJ friends will also find that people with this personality type
are very difficult to “read.” Not only are INTJs comparatively
unemotional, they are also likely to try to suppress emotions that
get through their mental filters.
Emotions are definitely the INTJ’s Achilles’ heel, so they do their best to not let them through, in fear of breaching that shield of logic and rationality. And vice versa, INTJs may be quite insensitive when it comes to their friends’ feelings. In all likelihood, the INTJ would honestly have no clue how to react to something on the emotional level.
Not for the faint hearted
INTJs have no difficulties relaxing and enjoying themselves among
close friends. Their renowned sarcasm and dark humor make INTJ
personalities great storytellers, as long as the audience can
understand (and withstand) their jokes. This is one of the reasons
why INTJs are usually very fond of Analysts (NT) or Diplomats (NF)
– they can read between the lines and follow the INTJ’s train of
thought. In contrast, Observant (S) types are likely to find this
personality type quite frustrating.
People with the INTJ personality type tend to be truly gifted and bright individuals, seeking personal growth and development, and encouraging their friends to follow the same path. If the INTJ is able to connect to another person at this level, their friendship will likely be strong and long-lasting. INTJs are generally very “low maintenance” friends, who do not require much attention or constant contact. They understand the value of privacy and independence and will actually push their friends to become more independent as well.
INTJ parents
INTJ personality traits are not usually considered ideal as far as
parenting is concerned. INTJs tend to be very rational,
perfectionistic, and relatively insensitive individuals, which goes
against the stereotypical image of warm, caring, traditional
parents.
However, it could be said that this is simply a reflection of the fact that society is dominated by more sensitive and traditional personality types. In contrast, INTJ parents are more likely to focus on making sure that their children grow up to be able to make independent and rational decisions.
Not surprisingly, people with the INTJ personality type will probably have difficulties supporting their children emotionally. INTJs are used to suppressing their own emotions and will struggle if their child is very sensitive. There are many other personality types that have difficulties in this area, but INTJ personalities are likely to find this especially difficult.
INTJs will be excellent advisors when it comes to planning, rational advice, help with studies, etc., but they are unlikely to know how to react when their child asks for their help with a matter that is emotional in nature.
That being said, most INTJ parents will be able to ensure that their children are very well prepared to deal with the challenges that life throws their way. They will likely be demanding yet liberal and open-minded parents, encouraging their children to develop and use their own mind instead of trying to protect them from the world as long as possible.
INTJ careers
INTJ personalities are known for their ability to digest difficult
and complex theories and principles relevant to their careers and
then convert them into clear and actionable ideas. INTJs are
excellent strategists, possessing intuition and confidence that
allow them to devise and implement challenging, long-term plans
without many problems. These skills can be tremendously valuable in
the right career path.
People with this personality type are great at jobs that involve planning, strategy, and application of complex theoretical principles. For instance, you could find many INTJs among project managers, system engineers, or marketing strategists. These are often their best career choices.
Typical INTJ careers also tend to put a lot of importance on independent thinking. INTJs love difficult challenges and strongly detest routine, doing whatever they can to avoid or automate mind-numbing tasks.
It is difficult to imagine an INTJ willingly choosing a strictly administrative or teamwork-focused role. They excel as “lone wolves” and the best INTJ careers revolve around this trait, giving INTJs enough breathing space to use their creativeness and dedication without being constantly questioned by other team members.
Thou shalt not cheat
People with this personality type put effectiveness and competence
above everything else. Consequently, the best INTJ careers reward
personal initiative and determination. INTJs believe that everyone
should do their best to complete the task to the highest possible
standard and loathe individuals who use social activities and
networking rather than merit to get ahead on the career
ladder.
There really is no easier way to lose the
respect of an INTJ than to show that you believe social skills and
relationships are more important than professional competence.
INTJs have very high standards, especially when it comes to their
own work, and are likely to put in an extraordinary amount of
effort to get the job done. Consequently, typical INTJ careers
reward inventiveness, dedication, and
insightfulness.
Where is my drawing
board?
INTJs tend to have excellent analytical and creative skills. They
are highly unlikely to choose or enjoy customer-facing or
teamwork-oriented careers; these are definitely not the best
choices for INTJs. As already mentioned, INTJs are brilliant
strategists and planners, but they do best alone or in small teams.
People with this personality type will gladly accept someone else’s
authority and leadership, as long as they see that individual as
competent.
These traits make INTJs excellent engineers, military strategists, programmers, system analysts, lawyers, or freelance consultants. These are typical INTJ career paths, and their performance in these areas is often very impressive.
INTJ in the workplace
Most of us will spend a huge percentage of our life at work. This
is why we believe that discussing how different personality types
behave in the workplace is important. What drives them or makes
them miserable? How can you create a mutually beneficial and
productive relationship with a specific personality type? How
should you handle conflicts with them?
Let’s talk about the INTJ personality type in
this case. What should you know about an INTJ colleague? An INTJ
manager? Or maybe an INTJ subordinate? We are going to tackle these
questions one by one.
INTJ Colleagues
Fiercely independent at work, people with the INTJ
personality type are “lone wolves”
Love challenges, especially if they get complete
responsibility (no need to share the glory)
Prefer working alone, mostly because they believe that others
are only going to slow them down
Enjoy brainstorming in the workplace, as long as the
discussion does not descend into arguments over details
Have perfectionist tendencies and very rarely give up
Cannot stand inefficiency or colleagues who refuse to use
more efficient methods
Loathe manual work, especially where it can be
automated
See little point in networking, socializing, or small talk at
work
Intensely private and likely to deflect personal
questions
Very sarcastic and highly likely to make fun (in their own
minds) of less insightful colleagues by making them read between
the lines
Dislike phone calls and prefer e-mail instead
Brilliant masterminds and analysts, able to recognize various
undercurrents and tension between certain colleagues in the
workplace and avoid them (INTJs are unlikely to use this knowledge
to their advantage though)
Extremely judgmental—people with the INTJ personality type
are likely to have very little respect for colleagues they believe
are incompetent
Beware of a quiet INTJ during the brainstorming session; it is quite unlikely that they have nothing to say. The more likely explanation is that they do not respect you enough to bother airing their opinions.
INTJ Managers
Have very high standards when it comes to professional
competence
Willing to give their subordinates a lot of freedom at
work
Casual and relaxed, valuing independent thinking more than
protocol
Despise schmoozing or attempts to manipulate—this will not
work on an INTJ
Likely to treat subordinates as equals
Respect people with strong opinions, even if they contradict
their own views—as long as arguments are nonemotional
More interested in strategy than tactical
implementation
Strive for efficiency in the workplace—do not take the risk
of telling an INTJ manager that you have always done things this
way
Highly respect and reward initiative
Do not mind being proven wrong if someone else’s argument is
better
Will not get involved in office gossip or
socializing
INTJ Subordinates
Only respect the manager if they are actually
competent—titles mean nothing to someone with an INTJ
personality
Have no problems criticizing their manager’s statements if
they believe the manager is intelligent enough to reconsider their
position if proven wrong.
Accept and actually enjoy criticism at work, as long as it is
followed by valid arguments
Unlike most other personality types, INTJs rarely see
managerial positions as desirable; they would rather be well-paid
experts. People with this personality type are unlikely to be a
threat to their managers from this perspective.
May become frustrated when not given enough freedom at
work
Are likely to strongly resist attempts to pigeon-hole them
into specific, well-defined roles
http://www.16personalities.com/
Racial destruction
Sorry BAME - we whites are the minority within
our world - we will shortly be a minority in our own
countries.
We knew this in 2000 (likely sooner after Blair came to power) -
the time of this article was September 2000 and we still continued
mass immigration.
How Flipping stupid is our corrupt governments to be the authors of
our own racial demise.
This is certainly not about 'white superiority' - simply about
racial cleansing and neoliberal globalisation of our country.
Quote: The last days of a white
world
We are near a global watershed - a time when white people will not
be in the majority in the developed world, Britain included.
Anthony Browne reports
https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2000/sep/03/race.world
Not just here - but also in America - on 17 February 2015 Biden stated:
“An unrelenting stream of immigration, nonstop, nonstop. Folks like me who were Caucasian, of European descent for the first time in 2017 will be in an absolute minority in the United States of America, absolute minority. Fewer than 50 percent of the people in America from then and on will be White European stock. That’s not a bad thing. That’s as a source of our strength.”
Racial Prejudice
We whites are accused of this false slur - moreso over recent years. It is to make us more accepting of mass immigration - you see that don't you?
Fact is all races prefer the company of their own race - prejudicial for being in warmth of those you have common ancestry, culture and customs etc.
Sorry that is not racism - closest to being is tribal loyalty. For multiculturalists - look at how immigrants group together - are they being racist too then?
Chinese ethnic group biggest earners in the UK
Sorry BAME - is this what the woke once called racism then?
Quote: Chinese and Indian ethnic group workers have higher average earnings than their white British counterparts, the first detailed official figures show.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-48919813
GCSE English and maths results in the 2020 to 2021 academic year - racism?
35.9% of pupils from the Black
Carribean ethnic group got a grade 5 or above –
the lowest percentage out of all ethnic groups -
racism?
48.9% of pupils from the Black ethnic group got a grade 5 or above
– is this more racism?
50.9% of pupils from the White British group got a grade 5 or
above – average-ish
51.9% of pupils in England got a grade 5 or above in GCSE English
and maths
83.8% of pupils from the Chinese ethnic group got a grade 5 or
above – the highest percentage out of all ethnic groups - WTF is
going on?
Defamation
For
those that falsely claim this is defamation (to stop criticism) -
perhaps BG or Ofcom: The UK Defamation Act 2013 "provides increased
protection to operators of websites that host user-generated
content, providing they comply with the procedure to enable the
complainant to resolve disputes directly with the author of the
material concerned". However, you already have address & email,
it is documented so I would like to see you try deny what you
did.
The Act also "introduces new statutory defences of truth and honest opinion to replace the common law defences of justification. and fair comment" - so I really cannot lose. The fact of the matter is that all this is documented - so is not libelous either in truth or honest opinion.
Key areas of UK Defamation Act 2013
http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2012-13/defamation.html
garry anderson gini coefficient
For those wokers that like rainbows and different colours:
We have only one enemy demonstrably working against us e.g. immigration & inequality. Corrupt governments who want to be in power over the working class and lie to us.
We have only one enemy demonstrably working against us e.g. immigration & inequality. Corrupt governments who want to be in power over the working class and lie to us
We have only one enemy demonstrably working against us e.g. immigration & inequality. Corrupt governments who want to be in power over the working class and lie to us
We have only one enemy demonstrably working against us e.g. immigration & inequality. Corrupt governments who want to be in power over the working class and lie to us
We have only one enemy demonstrably working against us e.g. immigration & inequality. Corrupt governments who want to be in power over the working class and lie to us
We have only one enemy demonstrably working against us e.g. immigration & inequality. Corrupt governments who want to be in power over the working class and lie to us
We have only one enemy demonstrably working against us e.g. immigration & inequality. Corrupt governments who want to be in power over the working class and lie to us.
We are now taught that greed is good e.g. it used to be rude to jump a queue, now you just pay to do it. Not just at amusement parks but for your families health. All made worse with mass immigration, I can answer any criticism you have of this factual statement. Try think of something new (for self-inflicted multiculturalism cancer).
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2023/jan/07/revealed-nhs-trusts-tell-patients-they-can-go-private-and-jump-hospital-queues
"Vote Fascist for a third glorious decade of total
law enforcement."
"Be a government informer - betray your family and
friends - fabulous prizes to be won."
Red Dwarf Season 5 Episode 6 - Back To Reality
GRADE INFLATION
We are not teaching children to think for themselves - just to get the result those in power want - using the government and education authorities to mould our children.
They have to teach young gullible minds to support their false ideologies e.g. 'Why is Diversity Good & Important?'. This when it demonstrably causes division and conflict.
Not forgetting, 'What causes Global Warming?' - though this now more discussed as 'climate change' because climate change has always happened and easier to lie about.
That mass immigration is good is never challenged but is fact - nor is the world being destroyed by man pumping CO2 to choke the planet - when it is essential to life.
Here is evidence of grade inflation - try be objective. How likely is it that the number of cleverest have more than doubled in such a short space of time to 20+%?
Countries with similar Gini coefficients can have vastly different inequality levels:
Australia is NOT getting warmer - it is another con.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/uk-workers-have-had-the-worst-wage-growth-in-the-oecd-except-greece-a7773246.html
WHITE PRIVILEGE
Quote: Teaching of 'white privilege' is 'rife' in schools, MPs are warned as dossier reveals pupils are being given 'politically biased' lessons on police, racism and colonialism
Coming from a poor working class home in 1950's Liverpool (Everton), parents living with mums parents, I know there is no privilege just for being white.
Additional: I also mention the following because BAME (as they were later called) were a rare people (1 in 1000?) and shows racism also rare (with kids).
When 6/7 I had a Pakistani friend for a few days, until his dad (doctor) stopped him playing with me. I bet he had a better life e.g. university and career.
I used to sag school and play in the back entry (jigger) or next street. He came down the road looking as posh as a tailors dummy in his school uniform.
Insert childhood photos here xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I failed 11 plus and went to Gateacre comp. I felt sorry for a young lady maths teacher who could not control the class - I knew then I need to improve.
The 'secret' to boosting intelligence was obvious and so targeted improving my maths skills. This luckily coincided with our move to Runcorn.
Uni was never an option for me - even though I was now top of class (proof). White working class boys do worse - did you honestly not know that fact?
Recent June 2021 report: The forgotten: how White working-class pupils have been let down, and how to change it
https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5802/cmselect/cmeduc/85/8502.htm?
Below
is what happened to my right hand as a young lad working in a
factory when we don't have unions - with no safety guards on
machines.
All
in the name of increased efficiency/ productivity/ profitability -
for competitiveness and economic-growth - well being honest - just
greed.
There is only one main privilege in this world - and it does not care what colour you are - money and power is not racist.
Even today this corrupt system still makes white working class boys the losers:
Quote: White boys are the ONLY group to see fall in places at university as their numbers drop by 10% in seven years
Figures show that the number of white men getting on to degree courses has fallen almost ten per cent compared to 2014. In contrast, the number of Asian men securing places has risen by 26 per cent, and Asian women 39 per cent.
In a report this year, MPs found white children
on free school meals – and boys in particular – persistently
underperform at school compared with other ethnic
groups.
As
a result, just 13 per cent of white working-class boys go on to
higher education. The Education Select Committee’s report warned
these children had been failed by decades of neglect.
When you tear out a man's tongue, you are not proving him a liar, you're only telling the world that you fear what he might say. George R.R. Martin.
Any fool can know - the point is to understand. Ernest Kinoy script writer - not Albert Einstein.
Be careful when you follow the masses - sometimes the M is silent. Prof. Feynman.
No one is more hated than he who speaks the truth. Plato.
Don't take criticism from somebody you would never go to for advice. Unknown.
They muddy the water to make it seem deep. Friedrich Nietzsche
If liberty means anything at all it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear. George Orwell
Government propaganda being used in UK even today:
If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it,
people will eventually come to believe it. Joseph
Goebbels.
Propaganda works best when those who are being manipulated are confident they are acting on their own free will. Joseph Goebbels.
I used this above as my site tab graphic from public domain^
I created this below as graphic header for my site and decided not to use v
IPCC Fraud - those telling the truth have no need to lie - so why do they do so? Why alter archival data - not just here but in historical temperature records?
Insert other photos here
Here below is what they used below as an excuse to stop benefits when my health got worse while trying to return to work part time. As I then dared questioned their sound judgement they also wanted me to reimburse all benefits paid - because I did not get better so the work was clearly not therapeutic. This while my health worsenned. v
Here below is my report from school - I was obviously miles ahead of the rest of class in maths v
Graphic for those poor at maths to explain to others about a few techniques used by economists who all lie to us:
V
IPCC Fraud - those telling the truth have no need to lie - so why do they do so? Why alter archival data - not just here but in historical temperature records?